Hunter v. Pfizer, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/28/2010. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2010)

Hunter v. Pfizer, Inc. et al

Doc. 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Now pending before the Court are the motions of counsel for the above-named Plaintiffs to withdraw as counsel of record for the above-named Plaintiffs. After carefully considering the motions, the Court ORDERS PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE as to why (1) counsels' motions to withdraw as counsel of record should not be granted; and (2) Plaintiffs' lawsuits should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. If any Plaintiff wishes to contest the withdrawal of counsel and/or dismissal of Plaintiff's lawsuit for failure to prosecute, Plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing on or before October 29, 2010 of the reasons the withdrawal should not be granted or the case dismissed. If any -1ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Barbara Hunter Floyd Thanes Stephanie Pearson 06-6419 CRB 08-1411 CRB 10-3060 CRB CASE NO. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff will be proceeding without a lawyer, such Plaintiff must advise the Court of how the Court should contact Plaintiff. Plaintiffs are warned that Plaintiffs' failure to communicate with the Court in writing as set forth above may result in dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs' counsel shall ensure that Plaintiffs receive a copy of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2010 Hon. Charles R. Breyer United States District Court

-2ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL