Jefferson v. Chase Home Finance LLC

Filing 225

STIPULATION AND ORDER regarding corrected final approval order. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/23/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

G. SCOTT EMBLIDGE, State Bar No. 121613 ROBERT D. SANFORD, State Bar No. 129790 SYLVIA SOKOL, State Bar No. 200126 MOSCONE, EMBLIDGE, & QUADRA, LLP 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] JAMES C. STURDEVANT, State Bar No. 94551 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 354 Pine Street, Fourth Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff T.C. JEFFERSON on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION T.C. JEFFERSON, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE and DOES 1-150, Defendants. Case No.: C06-6510 TEH CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER REGARDING CORRECTED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CORRECTED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER CASE NO. C06-6510 TEH (BZ)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, a Final Order and Judgment Granting Final Approval of Class Settlement ("Final Order") was signed and entered by the Court on February 23, 2009. (Docket # 223.) WHEREAS, thereafter counsel for the parties discovered that the Final Order contains a few minor typographical errors regarding the timing of Defendant Chase Home Finance LLC's performance under the Settlement Agreement. WHEREAS, counsel have agreed and wish to correct these errors so that the Final Order is consistent with the substance of the Settlement Agreement. The document attached as Exhibit A is a redlined version of the Final Order reflecting the typographical errors at issue. The document attached as Exhibit B is the proposed Corrected Final Order. WHEREAS, the parties have been diligently complying with the terms of the Final Order and correction of the typographical errors are not expected to delay performance under the Settlement. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and AGREED THAT: The parties respectfully request that the Court sign the proposed Corrected Final Order as of the date of the original Final Order, i.e., February 23, 2009, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, and that it be deemed entered as of February 23, 2009.

Dated: April 1, 2009

MOSCONE, EMBLIDGE & QUADRA, LLP THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation By: /s/ James C. Sturdevant JAMES C. STURDEVANT Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: April 1, 2009

BURKE, WARREN, MACKAY & SERRITELLA, P.C. By: /s/ Robert J. Emanuel ROBERT J. EMANUEL Attorneys for Defendant

1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CORRECTED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER CASE NO. C06-6510 TEH (BZ)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CORRECTED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER CASE NO. C06-6510 TEH (BZ)

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 04/23/09 DATED: ________________

UNIT ED

HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

J

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

e lton E. H dge The u

nderson

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H