Castro et al v. City of Sonoma et al

Filing 62

ORDER re costs. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/16/2009. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT F CASTRO JR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants. / No. C 06-06907 CRB ORDER Now pending before the Court is plaintiffs' objection to the defendants' Bill of Costs. Pursuant to Association of Mexican American Educators v. State of California, 231 F.3d 572, 592 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc), plaintiffs' seek an order from the Court refusing to award costs to defendants in their entirety. Plaintiffs explain that they have limited resources and health problems which would be exacerbated by an award of costs. Although plaintiffs filed their objection more than a month ago, defendants have not filed a response and apparently did not respond to plaintiffs' meet and confer solicitation. Accordingly, as plaintiffs' objection is unopposed, the Court strikes the Bill of Costs as to plaintiffs Robert Castro and Doug Richey in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2009 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G:\CRBALL\2006\6907\orderrerecosts.wpd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 G:\CRBALL\2006\6907\orderrerecosts.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?