Seiko Epson Corporation v. Optoma Technology, Inc.

Filing 403

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to 10/25/2010 for plaintiff to file responsive pleading; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 10/18/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

1 Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) ([e-mail]) 2 Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963) 3 ([e-mail]) ALSTON + BIRD LLP 4 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, CA 94025 5 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Coretronic Corporation 7 and Optoma Technology, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION,

James A. Oliff (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail]) John W. O'Meara (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail]) William J. Utermohlen (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail]) OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC 277 South Washington St., Suite 500 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Susan van Keulen (SBN 136060) ([e-mail]) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Anne E. Huffsmith (SBN 236438) ([e-mail]) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2 Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94025 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Seiko Epson Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CORETRONIC CORPORATION and OPTOMA ) TECHNOLOGY, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. 06-CV-06946 MHP STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION TO FILE OPPOSITION TO CORETRONIC AND OPTOMA'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: November 15, 2010 2:00 P.M. 15, 18th floor Marilyn Hall Patel

Plaintiff Seiko Epson Corporation ("Seiko Epson") and defendants Coretronic Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc., by and through their respective counsel, hereby file this Stipulated Request that Seiko Epson Corporation be permitted until October 25, 2010 to file its Opposition to Coretronic and Optoma's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,203,158. This will not require any change in the date of the hearing, which is scheduled for November 15, 2010, and is

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

consistent with the comments of the Court at the Case Management Conference held on September 20, 2010. For the foregoing reasons, and those described in the declaration of William J. Utermohlen filed herewith, the parties jointly request that this Court enter an Order permitting Seiko Epson until October 25, 2010 to file its Opposition to Coretronic and Optoma's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,203,158. DATED: October 12, 2010 _____________/s/_______________________ Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963) ALSTON + BIRD LLP 275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Coretronic Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc.

Respectfully submitted, _____________/s/_______________________ James A. Oliff (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) John W. O'Meara (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) William J. Utermohlen (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC 277 South Washington Street, Suite 500 Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Susan van Keulen (SBN 136060) James D. Moore (SBN 218187) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Anne E. Huffsmith (SBN 236438) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2 Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94025 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Seiko Epson Corporation

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Elizabeth H. Rader. Dated: October 12, 2010 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ Anne E. Huffsmith, Esq. (State Bar No. 236438)

Attorney for Seiko Epson Corporation

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SEIKO EPSON TO FILE OPPOSITION

2

Case No. C06-6946 MHP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

10/18 Dated: ___________________, 2010

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SEIKO EPSON TO FILE OPPOSITION

3

Case No. C06-6946 MHP

A

C

LI

FO

RDER ________________________________________ IS SO O T Marilyn Hall Patel I UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE l H. Pate Marilyn Judge
R NIA
NO

ED

RT U O

RT

H