Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Fund et al v. Sonoma Coast Drywall, LLC

Filing 4

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant, Case terminated. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/16/06. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2006)

Download PDF
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Fund et al v. Sonoma Coast Drywall, LLC Doc. 4 Case 3:06-cv-06995-SC Document 4 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 MURIEL B. KAPLAN (SBN: 124607) MICHELE R. STAFFORD (SBN: 172509) SALTZMAN AND JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 120 Howard Street, Suite 520 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 882-7900 Facsimile: (415) 882-9287 email@sjlawcorp.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. SONOMA COAST DRYWALL, LLC, Defendant ______________________________________ BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, ) CASE NO.: C 06-6995 SC ) ) ) JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ) STIPULATION ) ) ) ) ) ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, that Judgment in the within action may be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against defendant Sonoma Coast Drywall, LLC. as follows: 1. Defendant entered into the Northern California Drywall Finishers Master Agreement between District Council 16 and Northern California Drywall Contractors Association (hereinafter "Bargaining Agreement"). This Bargaining Agreement has continued in full force and effect to the present time. 2. Alfredo Vasquez, principal of Sonoma Coast Drywall, hereby acknowledges that he is authorized to receive service and has received the following documents in this action: Summons; Complaint; Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California; Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference; Order Setting Case Management Conference; Instructions for Completion of ADR Forms Regarding Selection of ADR Process; Stipulation and [Proposed] Order -1 - JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C 06-6995 SC P:\CLIENTS\SONOMA COAST DRYWALL 2\Pleadings\StipJud 110906.wpd Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-06995-SC Document 4 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Selecting ADR Process; Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference; ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel; ECF Registration Information Handout; Welcome to the U.S. District Court, San Francisco. 3. Pursuant to the Bargaining Agreement and the Trust Agreements of Plaintiff Funds as amended, which are incorporated into the Bargaining Agreement, defendant is indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $33,175.13, which includes July through September 2006 contributions as reported by Sonoma Coast, plus 10% liquidated damages, and interest at 7% per annum (through November 15, 2006) on the combined unpaid contributions and liquidated damages for the period July-September 2006, liquidated damages on the late paid contributions for the period February through June 2006, as well as attorneys fees and costs of this action, all as follows: July 2006 Contributions Liquidated Damages Interest to $11,338.36 $ 1,133.84 $ 208.10 $12,680.30 August 2006 Contributions Liquidated Damages Interest $9,223.43 $ 922.34 $ 108.96 $10,254.73 September 2006 Contributions Liquidated Damages Interest $3,254.12 $ 325.41 $ 17.85 $3,597.38 Liquidated Damages 25 26 27 28 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 $1,688.10 $2,007.37 $ 450.15 -2 - JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C 06-6995 SC P:\CLIENTS\SONOMA COAST DRYWALL 2\Pleadings\StipJud 110906.wpd Case 3:06-cv-06995-SC Document 4 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 4. 6 7 June 2006 $1,300.10 $5,445.72 Attorneys Fees (11/01/06 - 11/9/06) Costs of Suit $847.00 $350.00 TOTAL $33,175.13 Defendant shall pay $33,175.13, plus interest at a rate of seven percent (7%) per annum on the unpaid balance, as follows: (1) 8 month thereafter for a period of 12 months, through and including October 15, 2007, defendants 9 shall pay to plaintiffs the amount of $2,871.00. 10 (2) 11 (3) 12 The unpaid principal balance shall bear interest at the rate of 7% per annum from November 16, 13 2006, until paid in full, in accordance with plaintiffs' Trust Agreements; 14 (4) 15 delivered to Muriel B. Kaplan, Saltzman & Johnson Law Corporation, 120 Howard Street, Suite 16 17 other address as may be specified by plaintiffs; 18 (5) 19 of the final amount due, including any additional amounts incurred under the terms of this 20 Stipulation, and that amount shall be paid with the last payment, on or before October 15, 2007. 21 5. 22 October 2006, to be received by the Trust Funds no later than November 20, 2006, and for every 23 month thereafter until this judgment is satisfied, defendants shall remain current in contributions due 24 to plaintiffs under the current Collective Bargaining Agreement and under all subsequent collective 25 bargaining agreements, if any, and the Declarations of Trust as amended. Failure by Defendant to 26 remain current in its contributions shall constitute a default of the obligations under this agreement 27 and the provisions of Paragraph 7 shall apply. Any such unpaid contributions, together with 10% 28 -3 - On or before November 15, 2006, and no later than the 15th day of each Defendants shall have the right to increase the monthly payments at any time; Payments shall be applied first to unpaid interest and then to unpaid principal. Payments shall be made to the Bay Area Painters and Tapers Trust Funds, and 520, San Francisco, CA 94105 to be received on or before the 15th day of each month, or to such Prior to defendant's final payment hereunder, plaintiffs shall advise defendant Beginning with contributions due for hours worked by defendant's employees during JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C 06-6995 SC P:\CLIENTS\SONOMA COAST DRYWALL 2\Pleadings\StipJud 110906.wpd Case 3:06-cv-06995-SC Document 4 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 liquidated damages and 7% per annum interest accrued on those contributions, shall be added to and become a part of this Judgment and subject to the terms herein. Plaintiffs reserve all rights available under the applicable Bargaining Agreement and Declarations of Trust of the Trust Funds for collection of current and future contributions and the provisions of this agreement are in addition thereto. 6. It is further stipulated and agreed that Alfredo Vasquez, principal of Defendant Sonoma Coast Drywall, LLC, shall personally guarantee payment of the amounts owed by defendant to the plaintiffs, under the terms of this Stipulation. In consideration of the terms of this Stipulation, defendant, and Vasquez ("Guarantor"), submit herein to the jurisdiction of this Court and stipulate to the terms set forth herein for any payments due to Plaintiffs pursuant to paragraphs 4 and 5 herein. 7. In the event that Defendant fails to make any payment required under Paragraph 4 above, or fail to remain current in any contributions under paragraph 5 above, then plaintiffs will provide defendant with a written "notice of default" allowing 7 days from the date of the notice in which to cure the default. In the event that defendant or Guarantor does not cure the default within the proscribed time period, then: (A) The entire balance of $33,175.13, less principal payments received by Plaintiffs, but increased by any unpaid contributions then due, plus 10% liquidated damages and 7% per annum interest thereon as provided above shall be immediately due, together with any additional attorneys' fees and costs under section (D) below. (B) A writ of execution may be obtained against Defendant and Guarantor, without further legal action, in the amount of the unpaid balance, plus any additional amounts under the terms herein, upon declaration of a duly authorized representative of the plaintiffs setting forth any payment theretofore made by or on behalf of defendant and the balance due and owing as of the date of default. (C) Defendant expressly waives, waives notice of request for Writ of Execution, and all rights to stay of execution and appeal. Judgment may be entered and a Writ of Execution issued by a Magistrate or a District Court Judge or clerk of the court, without the necessity of a -4 - JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C 06-6995 SC P:\CLIENTS\SONOMA COAST DRYWALL 2\Pleadings\StipJud 110906.wpd Case 3:06-cv-06995-SC Document 4 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 noticed motion. (D) Defendant shall pay all additional costs and attorneys' fees incurred by plaintiffs in this matter, including, but not limited to those in connection with collection of the amounts owed by defendants to plaintiffs under this Stipulation. 8. Any failure on the part of the plaintiffs to take any action against defendant or Guarantor as provided herein in the event of any breach of the provisions of this Stipulation shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach by the defendants of any provisions herein. 9. Plaintiffs specifically reserve all rights to bring a subsequent action against defendant for the collection of any additional contribution delinquencies found to be due for the hours worked during the periods preceding the date of this Stipulation. Defendant specifically waives the defense of the doctrine of res judicata in any such action. Dated: November 13, 2006 Sonoma Coast Drywall, LLC. By: Its: Dated: November 13, 2006 By: /s/ Alfredo Vasquez (Title:) Operating Manager Alfredo Vasquez /s/ Alfredo Vasquez, individually SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION Dated: November 13, 2006 By: 23 24 /s/ Muriel B. Kaplan Attorneys for Plaintiffs ISTRIC ES D TC AT T UNIT ED S 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/16/06 27 28 ER N JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C 06-6995 SC P:\CLIENTS\SONOMA COAST DRYWALL 2\Pleadings\StipJud 110906.wpd F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Conti a Judge S muel R NIA IT IS S O ORD ERED RT U O NO RT H -5 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?