MMCA Group Ltd. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filing 460

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT PICA CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL. The motion is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 18, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

Donald S. Simon (Bar No. 189992) William C. Acevedo (Bar No. 194106) WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP 1111 Broadway, 24th Floor Post Office Box 2047 94604-2047 Oakland, CA 94607-4036 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Luis M. Alcalde, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) (OH Bar No. 0022848) 551 S. Third Street Columbus, OH 43215 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant PICA

11
11 1 1 Br o a d w a y , 2 4 t h F l o o r O a k l a n d , C A 94 6 0 7 - 4 0 3 6

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MMCA GROUP LTD., a Virginia corporation, Plaintiff,

Case No. CV 06-07067-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT PICA CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Civ. L.R. 79-5]

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, PINKERTON CONSULTING & INVESTIGATIONS EUROPE, a foreign corporation, PICA, an Ohio corporation, RODOLFO DIAZ, an individual, WARREN ROTHER, an individual alien, ROBERT COZZOLINA, an individual, KEVIN HUNSAKER, an individual, Defendants.

014526.0001\1137066.1

ORDER SEALING REPLY PAPERS ­ Case No. CV 06-07067-MMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

On February 6, 2009 Defendant PICA Corporation ("PICA") filed an Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal ("Administrative Motion") asserting that the designated material is subject to being sealed. Having considered the Administrative Motion, the Declaration of William C. Acevedo in support thereof, and proof having been made to the satisfaction of the Court that the Administrative Motion should be granted, THE COURT FINDS THAT: 1. Defendant PICA Corporation's Opposition to MMCA's Request for

Continuance of Summary Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 56(f) contains confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; 2. PICA's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply to Plaintiff

11
11 1 1 Br o a d w a y , 2 4 t h F l o o r O a k l a n d , C A 94 6 0 7 - 4 0 3 6

MMCA Group, Ltd.'s Opposition to PICA's Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (hereinafter, the "Reply") contains confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; 3. The Supplemental Declaration of Rodolfo Diaz and Exhibits A and B

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

submitted in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; 4. The evidentiary objections to the Declaration of Robert Creswell submitted

by PICA in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; 5. The evidentiary objections to the Declaration of Lau Geckler submitted by

PICA in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; 6. The evidentiary objections to the Declaration of Thomas Byrne submitted

by PICA in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; 7. The evidentiary objections to the Declaration of Jorge Barahona submitted

by PICA in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing;
ORDER SEALING REPLY PAPERS ­ Case No. CV 06-07067-MMC

014526.0001\1137066.1

-1-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

8.

The evidentiary objections to the Declaration of Pedro Antonio Martinez

Acosta submitted by PICA in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; 9. The evidentiary objections to the Declaration of Aldo Nestor Alvarez

submitted by PICA in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing; and 10. The evidentiary objections to the Declaration of M. Morgan Cherry

submitted by PICA in Support of PICA's Reply contain confidential information that should be withheld from public viewing.

11
11 1 1 Br o a d w a y , 2 4 t h F l o o r O a k l a n d , C A 94 6 0 7 - 4 0 3 6

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 11. 12. PICA's Administrative Motion is GRANTED. The documents and exhibits referenced above, whenever filed, in whole or

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

in part, with the Court in this case, shall be filed under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2009

By: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge

014526.0001\1137066.1

ORDER SEALING REPLY PAPERS ­ Case No. CV 06-07067-MMC

-2-