MMCA Group Ltd. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filing 568

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON PICA CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND. MMCA's opposition shall be filed no later than July 22, 2009, and PICA's reply shall be filed no later than July 27, 2009. The motion will stand submitted on the date PICA's reply is due and will be decided without a hearing, unless the Court hereafter determines a hearing is necessary. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 15, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff MMCA Group, Ltd. ("MMCA") and defendant PICA Corporation's ("PICA") stipulated request, filed July 14, 2009, for an order shortening time on PICA's Motion for Leave to Amend Answer and to File Counterclaim, filed July 10, 2009 and noticed for hearing August 14, 2009. Having read and considered the stipulated request, the Court rules as follows. 1. To the extent MMCA and PICA seek a shortened briefing schedule on PICA's motion, the request is hereby GRANTED; MMCA's opposition to said motion shall be filed no later than July 22, 2009, and PICA's reply shall be filed no later than July 27, 2009. 2. To the extent MMCA and PICA seek an order scheduling a hearing on PICA's motion on July 30, 2009 at 10:30 a.m., the request is hereby DENIED, as the Court's trial schedule does not allow for a hearing at such time. Accordingly, the motion will stand submitted on the date PICA's reply is due and will be decided without a hearing, unless the v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / MMCA GROUP LTD., Plaintiff, No. C-06-7067 MMC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON PICA CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Court hereafter determines a hearing is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 15, 2009

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

2