MMCA Group Ltd. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filing 696

ORDER SEALING DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S "MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO MODIFY PRETRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DAUBERT MOTION." Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 16, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP WILLIAM F. ABRAMS, SBN 88805 [e-mail] DAVID S. CANNON, SBN 209501 [e-mail] 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JEFFREY T. THOMAS, SBN 106409 [e-mail] SAMUEL LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578 [e-mail] 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys For Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MMCA GROUP, LTD., a Virginia corporation, Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, PINKERTON CONSULTING & INVESTIGATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation; BUSINESS RISKS INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED, an United Kingdom corporation, d/b/a PINKERTON CONSULTING & INVESTIGATIONS ­ EUROPE, PICA, an Ohio corporation, Defendants. CASE NO. C06-7067 MMC (EMC) [PROPOSED ORDER] SEALING DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO MODIFY PRETRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DAUBERT MOTION [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); Civ. L.R. 7-11, 79-5] [No Hearing Required] Place: Judge: Courtroom 7, Floor 19 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING HP'S MOTION TO CONTINUE; CASE NO. C06-7067 MMC (EMC)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

On December 4, 2009, Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") filed an Administrative Motion to Seal HP's Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial Dates or, in the Alternative, to Modify Pretrial Briefing Schedule for Daubert Motion and a supporting Declaration of Samuel Liversidge, establishing that the designated material is subject to being sealed. The Court, having considered the Administrative Motion and Declaration, finds the requested material in HP's Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial Dates or, in the Alternative, to Modify Pretrial Briefing Schedule for Daubert Motion, subject to being sealed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Clerk shall file HP's Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial Dates or, in the Alternative, to Modify Pretrial Briefing Schedule for Daubert Motion under seal. The Clerk shall place the redacted version of Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial Dates or, in the Alternative, to Modify Pretrial Briefing Schedule for Daubert Motion in the public record.

IT IS SO ORDERED. December 16, 2009 Dated: ________________________ ___________________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge

100773208_1.DOC

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING HP'S MOTION TO CONTINUE; CASE NO. C06-7067 MMC (EMC)