MMCA Group Ltd. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filing 883

ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP'S PRETRIAL FILINGS; DIRECTIONS TO HP. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 1, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Bingham McCutchen LLP WILLIAM F. ABRAMS (SBN 88805) [e-mail] DAVID S. CANNON (SBN 209501) [e-mail] ERIN A. SMART (SBN 246288) [e-mail] AUDREY LO (SBN 253738) [e-mail] OLIVIA PARA (SBN 255592) [e-mail] 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.849.4800 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MMCA GROUP LTD., Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY ET AL., Defendants.

06-7067 No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC)
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP'S PRETRIAL FILINGS ; DIRECTIONS TO HP L. R. Civ. P. 79-5 [No Hearing Required] Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC)

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP'S PRETRIAL FILINGS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// ///

On February 1, 2010, Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") filed an Administrative Motion to Seal Material in HP's Pretrial Filings ("Administrative Motion") and a supporting declaration ("Declaration") establishing that the designated material is subject to being sealed. The Court, having considered the Administrative Motion and Declaration, finds the following material in HP's pretrial filings subject to being sealed: 1. Portions of HP's Motion In Limine No. 1 To Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Allegations of Trade Secret Disclosure Through DMS; [Proposed] Order 2. Portions of HP's Motion In Limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Damages Irrelevant to Remaining Claims and Damages Not Calculated by Plaintiff's Damages Expert; [Proposed] Order 3. Portions of HP's Motion In Limine No. 3 To Exclude Evidence And Argument Regarding Luis Ortega's Employment Interviews; [Proposed] Order 4. Portions of HP's Motion In Limine No. 4 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Three Ethics Complaints; [Proposed] Order 5. Portions of HP's Motion In Limine No. 6 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Irrelevant, Unfairly Prejudicial, and Hearsay Evidence Regarding Alleged Relationships, Purported Pretexting, Employment Termination, Immigration Status and Alleged "Entrapment Seizures;" [Proposed] Order 1, 3, 4 6. Exhibits 1-4 and 6-20 to the Declaration of Erin A. Smart in Support of HP's Motions in Limine and Motion for Reconsideration

1

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC)

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP'S PRETRIAL FILINGS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 79 of the Local Civil Rules of the Northern District of California, the Administrative Motion is GRANTED. HP is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, no later than March 8, 2010, Exhibits 2 and 5 to the Declaration of Erin A. Smart in Support of Hewlett-Packard's Motions IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: in Limine and Motion for Reconsideration. Whenever filed, in whole or in part, with the Court in this case, the material referenced above shall be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 1 DATED: _____________, 2010 By: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

2

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC)

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP'S PRETRIAL FILINGS