MMCA Group Ltd. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filing 888

ORDER SEALING IN PART MMCA'S OPPOSITIONS TO HP'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-4 & 6-8 AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 2, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Frederick J. Geonetta (SBN 114824) [e-mail] Kenneth N. Frucht (SBN 178881) [e-mail] GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP 100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Robert A. Weikert (SBN 121146) [e-mail] Matthew J. Frankel (SBN 256633) [e-mail] Sushila Chanana (SBN 254100) [e-mail] NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111­3600 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] R. Mark Halligan (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] NIXON PEABODY LLP 300 South Riverside Plaza, 16th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff MMCA Group, LTD. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MMCA GROUP, LTD., a Virginia corporation, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CV 06-07067-MMC (EMC) IN PART [PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MMCA's ^ OPPOSITIONS TO TO HP'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-4 & 6-8 AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE; [L.R. Civ. P. 79-5] [No Hearing Required] Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

22 v. 23 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et al 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MMCA'S OPPOSITIONS TO TO HP'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-4 & 6-8 AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

1
12882601.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 · · · · · · · ·

On February 8, 2010, Plaintiff MMCA Group, Ltd. ("MMCA") filed an Administrative Motion to Seal ("Administrative Motion") and the Declaration of Matthew Frankel in Support of MMCA's Administrative Motion ("Declaration"). The Court, having considered the Administrative Motion and Declaration, finds the following information shall be filed under seal: PLAINTIFF MMCA'S OPPOSITION TO HP'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF TRADE SECRET DISCLOSURE THROUGH DMS PLAINTIFF MMCA'S OPPOSITION TO HP'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 (DAMAGES IRRELEVANT TO REMAINING CLAIMS) PLAINTIFF MMCA'S OPPOSITION TO HP'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING LUIS ORTEGA'S EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEWS PLAINTIFF MMCA'S OPPOSITION TO HP'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING THREE ETHICS COMPLAINTS PLAINTIFF MMCA'S OPPOSITION TO HP'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6 (VARIOUS) PLAINTIFF MMCA'S OPPOSITION TO HP'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7 (COZZOLINA/HUNT EMAIL CHAIN) PLAINTIFF MMCA'S OPPOSITION TO HP'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8 TO EXCLUDE INADMISSIBLE AND PAROL EVIDENCE REGARDING THE MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN HP AND MMCA PLAINTIFF MMCA GROUP, LTD.'S OMNIBUS DECLARATION OF KENNETH FRUCHT IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF MMCA GROUP, LTD.'S OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT HP'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE, AND ACCOMPANYING EXHIBITS A ­ FF. A-N, P-V, X-FF. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 79 of the Local Civil Rules of the Northern District of California,

the Administrative Motion is GRANTED. to the extent set forth above. , FURTHER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: To the extent plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal Exhibits O and W to the Omnibus Declaration of Kenneth Frucht, the motion is denied, and the Clerk shall file said exhibits Whenever filed, in whole or in part, with the Court in this case, the material referenced above in the public record. shall be filed under seal: March 2, 2010 Dated: ____________ __________________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MMCA'S OPPOSITIONS TO TO HP'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-4 & 6-8 AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE 12882601.1