Valladon v. City of Oakland
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMIT, and RESCHEDULING MOTION HEARING. 297 , 299 , 303 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 16, 2009 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge v. CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant. / ROBERT VALLADON, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 06-07478 SI ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMIT, and RESCHEDULING MOTION HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oakland's reply brief in support of its motion for partial summary judgment on subgroups N, O, and P exceeded the 15-page limit by five pages and included new evidence that was not cited in Oakland's opening brief. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to strike Oakland's reply and Oakland has, belatedly, sought leave to file an oversized brief. The Court DENIES plaintiffs' motion to strike [Docket Nos. 297, 299] and GRANTS Oakland's request to file a brief in excess of fifteen pages [Docket No. 303]. If plaintiffs wish to file a sur-reply and rebuttal declarations, they shall do so by noon on July 23, 2009. Plaintiffs' sur-reply shall not exceed five pages. The July 17, 2009 hearing on defendants' motion for summary judgment on subgroup Q remains on calendar as scheduled. The parties' cross-motions on subgroups N, O, and P shall be heard during the week of July 27. The parties shall select a select a mutually convenient date and time with the courtroom deputy. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?