Prakash v. Pulsent Corporation Employee Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 273

BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/12/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\BZALL\-REFS\PRAKASH V. PULSENT\BRIEFING ORDER.wpd UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ENIKO PRAKASH, Plaintiff(s), v. PULSENT CORPORATION, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C06-7592 SC (BZ) BRIEFING ORDER Judge Conti has referred Sun Life's motion to compel the Prakashs to produce documents and order for Verseon to produce documents and the order for Verseon to show cause why it should not be held in contempt to me. Because trial is imminent, IT IS ORDERED that the opposition to each motion shall be filed by February 20, 2009. by February 25, 2009. Any reply shall be filed The motions will be heard on March 4, 2009 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. Dated: February 12, 2009 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?