Prakash v. Pulsent Corporation Employee Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 300

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 285 Motion to Seal (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 G:\BZALL\-REFS\PRAKASH V. PULSENT\ORDER DENYING DEFS MOT TO SEAL.wpd UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ENIKO PRAKASH, Plaintiff(s), v. PULSENT CORPORATION, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C06-7592 SC (BZ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL The administrative motion to file Mr Albee's report under seal is DENIED. I have read the report. Plaintiffs' opposition is insufficient to establish that this document contains confidential or proprietary information or is otherwise protectable under Rule 26 and Local Rule 79-5. Plaintiffs' request that the report be stricken under Rule 12(f) should be directed to Judge Conti. Dated: March 4, 2009 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?