Prakash v. Pulsent Corporation Employee Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 385

ORDER allowing equipment into the Courtroom (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009)

Download PDF
Law Offices of Board Certified in Civil Trial Advocacy, NBTA Diplomate, National College of Advocacy Writer's Direct Tel : (510) 814-0680 Facsimile : (510) 814-0650 : (5 10) 8 14-6 100 Office Number E-mail : Lpadwayapadway .com 1516 Oak Street Suite 109 Alameda, CA 94501 March 19, 2009 Hon. Samuel Conti United States District Judge 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94 102 Re: Prakash v. Sun Life NO. 06-07592 SC Dear Judge Conti: Trial of this action is scheduled to commence March 30,2009. In connection with the trial of this matter, plaintiff will be bringing to Court the following items: Up to five laptop computers; A number of 30 x 40 enlargements; Up to three easels; A notebook projector Extension cords and cables In connection with the trial of this matter, Sun Life will be bringing to Court the following items: Up to 5 laptop computers and related hardware Elmo projector Hi-Lumens projector Projection screen Laser pointers Wooden pointer AV stand with skirt Tech table with skirt Up to three easels A number of enlargements/foam core boards, as large as 4' X 5' 3 VGA distribution amplifiers; 5 VGA switches Assorted cables/extensions Multiple boxes of exhibit materials, briefcases, notepads and general supplies The parties have not yet met with the Court's technkal liason, and these lists are therefore most likely overinclusive. The parties will make every attempt to limit the actual materials brought to court. Lead counsel for both parties have approved this letter. Very truly yours, Laurence F. Padway cc: J. Russell Stedman (via email) S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O UNIT ED S ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Judge S onti amuel C R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?