Crosthwaite et al v. Golden Hills Contractors, Inc. et al

Filing 54

JUDGMENT. Signed by Hon. Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/17/2008. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GIL CROSTHWAITE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN HILLS CONTRACTORS, et al., Defendants. / JUDGMENT No. C 06-07779 JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to this Court's Order adopting Magistrate Judge James' Report and Recommendation re: Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against DefendantsGolden Hills Contractors, Inc. and Donald Edward Wilson, judgment is HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the amount of $28,004.11, consisting of $1,218.14 in unpaid employer contributions; $6,831.19 in liquidated damages; $15,285.00 for attorneys' fees and costs. Said money judgment thereafter shall bear 12 percent per annum rate of interest on the combined May 2006 and Jun 2006 balance, and liquidated damages on the total contributions due for those months ($8,049.33), from March 11, 2008 to the date of the satisfaction of Judgment, and post-judgment interest on the balance of the unpaid judgment. In addition, Plaintiffs' request for an injunction is GRANTS. Defendants shall submit to an audit of its records for the period October 1, 2003 to date of inspection, by scheduling with ten days of the date of this Order, and keeping an appointment with Plaintiffs' auditor, and by 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 providing the necessary documents and allowing the auditor access to them on or before the scheduled date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 17, 2008 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?