Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Hamilton Supply Company Incorporated

Filing 78

ORDER dismissing dismissing Liberty and it's counter-claim (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:06-cv-07846-SI Document77-1 Filed07/08/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Gary R. Selvin, State Bar No.: 112030 SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP 505 14th Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1811 Facsimile: (510) 465-8976 E-mail: gselvin@selvinwraith.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant UTICA Mutual Insurance Company IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HAMILTON SUPPLY COMPANY INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Defendant; CASE NO.: 3:06-cv-07846-SI [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S COMPLAINT AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S COUNTERCLAIM Complaint Filed: December 22, 2006 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-in-Intervention, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Counter Claimant, Referred to Chief Magistrate Judge James Larson for Settlement. Trial Date: December 15, 2008 Assigned For All Purposes: Hon. Susan Illston 15 16 17 18 19 20 v. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Based on UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S STIPULATION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and the counterclaim in intervention of LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 1 UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Counter Defendant. [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 3:06-cv-07846-SI Case3:06-cv-07846-SI Document77-1 Filed07/08/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPANY are dismissed without prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Dated: ________________________________ Judge Susan Illston United States District Court Judge 50513.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 CASE NO.: 3:06-cv-07846-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?