USA v. Bonds

Filing 23

Proposed Order re 22 Stipulation by Barry Lamar Bonds Vacating Status Conference (Cassman, Ted) (Filed on 2/5/2008)

Download PDF
USA v. Bonds Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALLEN RUBY, (SBN 47109) Law Offices of Alan Ruby 125 S Market St #1001 San Jose, CA 95113-2285 Phone: (408) 998-8500 CRISTINA C. ARGUEDAS (SBN 87787) TED CASSMAN (SBN 98932) ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP 803 Hearst Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 Phone: 510.845.3000 DENNIS RIORDAN (SBN 69320) DONALD HORGAN (SBN 121547) RIORDAN & HORGAN 523 Octavia St San Francisco, CA 94102 Phone: (415) 431-3472 Attorneys for Defendant BARRY LAMAR BONDS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO VENUE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. BARRY LAMAR BONDS, Defendants. ____________________________________/ NO. CR 07-0732 SI ORDER [PROPOSED] VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE Based upon the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, it is ORDERED that the status conference on February 8, 2008 is vacated. It is further ordered that the calendar reflect that the case is on for both motions hearing and status conference on February 29, 2008, and that Mr. Bonds' presence is waived pursuant to 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Rule 43(b)(3), Fed. Rules Crim. Pro. It is further ordered that, prior to the date of the motions hearing, the defense shall file a written waiver, executed by Mr. Bonds, of his right to be present at the motions hearing. It is further ordered that there is excludable time through February 29, 2008, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) due to the pending motion. DATED: February __, 2008 __________________________ Susan Illston, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?