bebe stores, inc. et al v. forever 21 Inc et al

Filing 16

ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Andrew P. Bridges as ENE Evaluator dated 4/18/2007. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2007)

Download PDF
bebe stores, inc. et al v. forever 21 Inc et al Doc. 16 Case 3:07-cv-00035-MJJ Document 16 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California bebe stores, inc., Plaintiff(s), v. forever 21 Inc, Defendant(s). TO COUNSEL OF RECORD: The court notifies the parties and counsel that the Evaluator assigned to this case is: Andrew P. Bridges Winston & Strawn, LLP 101 California St., Suite 3900 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-591-1482 abridges@winston.com Counsel shall familiarize themselves with the requirements of ADR L.R. 5 which governs the ENE program. The evaluator will schedule a joint phone conference with counsel under ADR L.R. 5-7 and will set the date of the ENE session within the deadlines set by ADR L.R. 5-5 or the court order referring this action to ENE. The court permits the evaluator to charge each party its pro rata share of the cost of the phone conference. 07-00035 MJJ ENE Notice of Appointment of Evaluator United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Appointment of Evaluator 07-00035 MJJ ENE -1Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00035-MJJ Document 16 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California Counsel are reminded that the written ENE statements required by the ADR L.R. 5-8 shall NOT be filed with the court. Dated: April 18, 2007 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Alice M. Fiel ADR Case Administrator 415-522-3148 Alice_Fiel@cand.uscourts.gov United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Appointment of Evaluator 07-00035 MJJ ENE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?