Pokorny et al v. Quixtar Inc et al
Filing
341
ORDER re: Claimant Claude Zamor. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on June 12, 2014. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
JEFF POKORNY, LARRY BLENN, and
KENNETH BUSIERE, on behalf of
themselves and those similarly
situated,
10
11
Plaintiffs,
v.
12
QUIXTAR, INC., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
) Case No. 07-0201 SC
)
) ORDER RE: CLAUDE ZAMOR
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
15
16
17
The Court has received a letter from Claimant Claude Zamor --
18
sent to various judges but not, at first, to the undersigned, and
19
never filed on this case's docket -- indicating that he has "been
20
abused" in this case's settlement.
21
Mr Zamor received $2,000 to compensate his claimed losses for
22
Quixtar-related business support materials, per this case's
23
settlement agreement.
24
award, which the Special Master denied because Mr. Zamor, a
25
resident of Haiti, presented no proof that he operated a Quixtar
26
business in the United States (a requirement to participate in this
27
settlement) or that he had proved losses sufficient to qualify for
28
a hardship payment.
Afterward, he also requested a hardship
Mr. Zamor then appealed that objection to the
1
Court, which the Court reviewed de novo and denied for the same
2
reasons as the Special Master.
3
Now Mr. Zamor asks for a "penalty or compensation," apparently
4
because he did not know that the settlement class was for
5
plaintiffs who operated Quixtar businesses in the United States,
6
even though he submitted a claim and received a payment under the
7
settlement.
8
compensation" in this case's settlement agreement, or, more
9
generally, in the law or facts relevant to this case.
The Court finds no basis for such a "penalty or
Mr. Zamor's
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
request is DENIED.
Nor does the Court find that the Special Master
11
or any of the lawyers in this case have "abused" Mr. Zamor.
12
extent that Mr. Zamor's letter requests reconsideration of any of
13
his previous requests for class compensation, the request is
14
DENIED.
To the
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated: June 12, 2014
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?