Pokorny et al v. Quixtar Inc et al

Filing 341

ORDER re: Claimant Claude Zamor. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on June 12, 2014. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 9 JEFF POKORNY, LARRY BLENN, and KENNETH BUSIERE, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, 10 11 Plaintiffs, v. 12 QUIXTAR, INC., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) Case No. 07-0201 SC ) ) ORDER RE: CLAUDE ZAMOR ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 15 16 17 The Court has received a letter from Claimant Claude Zamor -- 18 sent to various judges but not, at first, to the undersigned, and 19 never filed on this case's docket -- indicating that he has "been 20 abused" in this case's settlement. 21 Mr Zamor received $2,000 to compensate his claimed losses for 22 Quixtar-related business support materials, per this case's 23 settlement agreement. 24 award, which the Special Master denied because Mr. Zamor, a 25 resident of Haiti, presented no proof that he operated a Quixtar 26 business in the United States (a requirement to participate in this 27 settlement) or that he had proved losses sufficient to qualify for 28 a hardship payment. Afterward, he also requested a hardship Mr. Zamor then appealed that objection to the 1 Court, which the Court reviewed de novo and denied for the same 2 reasons as the Special Master. 3 Now Mr. Zamor asks for a "penalty or compensation," apparently 4 because he did not know that the settlement class was for 5 plaintiffs who operated Quixtar businesses in the United States, 6 even though he submitted a claim and received a payment under the 7 settlement. 8 compensation" in this case's settlement agreement, or, more 9 generally, in the law or facts relevant to this case. The Court finds no basis for such a "penalty or Mr. Zamor's United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 request is DENIED. Nor does the Court find that the Special Master 11 or any of the lawyers in this case have "abused" Mr. Zamor. 12 extent that Mr. Zamor's letter requests reconsideration of any of 13 his previous requests for class compensation, the request is 14 DENIED. To the 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: June 12, 2014 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?