Rimac v. Duncan et al

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 9/18/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

RIMAC MARTIN A Professional Corporation ANNA M. MARTIN - State Bar No. 154279 WILLIAM REILLY - State Bar No. 177550 KEVIN G. GILL - State Bar No. 226819 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSEPH M. RIMAC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH M. RIMAC, Plaintiff, vs. RANDY DUNCAN, RANDY CRAWFORD, COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, and FORT DICK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

E-FILING
CASE NO. C-07-0298-SC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiff JOSEPH M. RIMAC and defendants RANDY DUNCAN, RANDY CRAWFORD, and FORT DICK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, through their respective counsel of record, that the captioned action may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties shall bear their own respective attorneys fees and costs of suit. Pursuant to local rules, this document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) plaintiff's counsel has -1S T IP U L A T IO N O F D IS M IS S A L C A S E N O . C-07-0298-SC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered. SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, RIMAC MARTIN, A Professional Corporation DATED: September 17, 2009 By: /s/ WILLIAM REILLY WILLIAM REILLY KEVIN G. GILL Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSEPH M. RIMAC

MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE

DATED: September 17, 2009

By:

___/s/ William Mitchell______ WILLIAM MITCHELL Attorneys for Defendant RANDY DUNCAN

HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL

DATED: September 17, 2009

By:

_/s/ STEPHEN CA IN E _________________ STEPHEN CAINE Attorneys for Defendants FORT DICK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, and RANDY CRAWFORD ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT ED

DATED: ____________________

September 18, 2009

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2S T IP U L A T IO N O F D IS M IS S A L C A S E N O . C-07-0298-SC

A

C

LI

FO

____________T IS___ORDERE_____________ __ SO _____ D I SAMUEL CONTI Federal Judge, U.S. DistricttiCourt el Con
Judge S amu

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT
H