Weinstein v. Saturn Corporation

Filing 56

ORDER VACATING REMAND OF EAST BAY AUTO GROUP. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 9, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BEHRAM V. PAREKH (180361) [e-mail] KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP 2361 Rosecrans Avenue, Fourth Floor El Segundo, California 90245 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for Plaintiff Richard A. Weinstein GREGORY R. OXFORD (62333) [e-mail] ISAACS CLOUSE CROSE & OXFORD LLP 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 950 Torrance, California 90503 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for Defendant Saturn Corporation WALTER J. R. TRAVER (113678) [e-mail] MUSICK PEELER & GARRETT LLP 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 2550 San Francisco , California 94104 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Counsel for Defendant East Bay Auto Group, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD A. WEINSTEIN on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. SATURN CORPORATION, EAST BAY AUTO GROUP, INC., dba SATURN OF OAKLAND and DOES 1 ­ 100, inclusive, Defendants.
Joint Case Management Conference Statement, No. C07-00348 MMC

Case No. C 07 0348 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING REMAND OF EAST BAY AUTO GROUP

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS after the Court's ruling granting Saturn's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, the Court remanded the remainder of the action as against East Bay Auto Group, Inc. ("East Bay") to Alameda County Superior Court. WHEREAS in light of the Ninth Circuit's ruling reversing, in part, the Court's ruling on Saturn's Motion to Dismiss, the parties are in agreement that East Bay should remain a party to this action; WHEREAS at the Case Management Conference held on February 27, 2009, the Court agreed to retake jurisdiction of plaintiff's claims against East Bay by way of stipulation of the parties to vacate the remand order; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties, upon the Court's signature of this document, that the portions of the Court's Order dated August 23, 2007, and Judgment dated August 28, 2007 remanding plaintiff's claims against East Bay are hereby vacated. DATED: March 6, 2009 BEHRAM V. PAREKH KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP By /s/_________________ Behram V. Parekh Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard A. Weinstein DATED: March 6, 2009 GREGORY R. OXFORD ISAACS CLOUSE CROSE & OXFORD LLP By /s/_________________ Gregory R. Oxford Attorneys for Defendant Saturn Corporation DATED: March 6, 2009 WALTER J. R. TRAVER MUSICK PEELER & GARRETT LLP By /s/_________________ Walter J. R. Traver Attorneys for Defendant East Bay Auto Group
Joint Case Management Conference Statement, No. C07-00348 MMC

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Joint Case Management Conference Statement, No. C07-00348 MMC March 9, 2009 DATED: ____________________

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. DATED: March 6, 2009 /s/_________________ Behram V. Parekh

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE