Hawks v. Kane
ORDER STRIKING 21 Supplemental Brief filed by Harold Harvey Hawks. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on June 30, 2010. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2010)
Hawks v. Kane
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. BEN CURRY, Acting Warden, Respondent. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HAROLD HARVEY HAWKS, Petitioner No. C 07-00366 JSW No. C 07-05039 JSW No. C 08-04605 JSW ORDER STRIKING PETITIONER'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On May 11, 2010, the Court issued an Order requiring the parties to submit supplemental briefing on their views as to the impact of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2001) on these matters. In that Order, the Court expressly stated that the parties' supplemental briefs were not to exceed 12 pages in length. On June 25, 2010, Petitioner filed a twenty-five page brief in each of these three cases, without seeking leave of Court to exceed the page limitations set in the May 11, 2010 Order. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY STRIKES from the record Petitioner's supplemental briefs filed on June 25, 2010. The Court shall give Petitioner leave to re-file a supplemental brief in these cases that comports with the page limitations set by the Court by no later than July 23, 2010. If Petitioner seeks leave to exceed these page limitations, he must submit a request to the Court demonstrating the need for additional pages by no later than July 2, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?