General Digital Corporation v. LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. et al

Filing 16

ORDER re 11 Joinder filed by Hitachi America Ltd,, Hitachi Electronics Devices (USA), Inc.,. Signed by Judge Martin J. Jenkins on 2/12/07. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2007)

General Digital Corporation v. LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. et al

Doc. 16

Case 3:07-cv-00452-SI

Document 16

Filed 02/13/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W SAN FRANCISCO

KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987 WILLIAM J. TAYLOR, State Bar No. 72902 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi America, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

General Digital Corporation, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaint iff, v. LG.Philips LCD Co. Ltd., et al., Defendants.

Case No. 07-0452 MJJ NOTICE OF JOINDER IN STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ; ORDER Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

28
1-SF/7494301.1 NOTICE OF JOINDER IN STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT C-07 -0452 MJJ

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-00452-SI

Document 16

Filed 02/13/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Hitachi America, Ltd. (hereinafter "HAL") and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. (hereinafter "HED-US") have, by written notice to Plaintiff in this action, joined in the Stipulation for Extension of Time between Plaintiff and defendant AU Optronics Corporation America dated and filed in this action on February 6, 2007 and currently awaiting approval by the Court (the "Stipulation"). Pursuant to the Stipulation, the deadline for HAL and HED-US to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended until the earlier of the following two dates: (1) forty-five days after the filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the LCD Cases; or (2) forty-five days after Plaintiff provides written notice to Defendants that it does not intend to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint, provided that such notice may be given only after the initial case management conference in the MDL transferee court in this case. The joinder in the Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by HAL and HED-US of any defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction, insufficiency o f process, insufficiency of service of process, or improper venue. Dated: February 7, 2007

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP KENT M. ROGER WILLIAM J. TAYLOR By: /s/ Kent M. Roger

Counsel for Defendants Hitachi America, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc IT IS SO ORDERED:

23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W SAN FRANCISCO

_________________ Martin J. Jenkins U.S. District Court

28
1-SF/7494301.1

1

NOTICE OF JOINDER IN STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT C-07 -0452 MJJ