Medtronic, Inc. et al v. AGA Medical Corporation

Filing 1022

ORDER GRANTING MEDTRONIC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST AGA'S EQUITABLE-ESTOPPEL AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 20, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 20, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Plaintiffs Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., and Medtronic Vascular, Inc.'s (collectively, "Medtronic") Motion for Summary Judgment Against AGA's Equitable-Estoppel Affirmative Defense and Counterclaim, filed February 27, 2009, came on regularly for hearing on November 20, 2009. James J. Elacqua and Andrew N. Thomases of Dechert LLP appeared on behalf of Medtronic. Steven D. Hemminger and Lance A. Lawson of Alston & Bird LLP appeared on behalf of defendant AGA Medical Corporation. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, as well as the arguments of counsel, the Court, for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, hereby GRANTS the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. v. AGA MEDICAL CORPORATION, Defendant. / United States District Court MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 07-567 MMC ORDER GRANTING MEDTRONIC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST AGA'S EQUITABLEESTOPPEL AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?