Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated
Filing
144
ORDER by Judge Alsup granting 136 Motion to Seal Document (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2007)
Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated
Doc. 144
Case 3:07-cv-00943-WHA
Document 144
Filed 10/03/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW PALO A L T O
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP RONALD S. KATZ (Bar No. CA 085713) E-mail: rkatz@manatt.com RYAN S. HILBERT (California Bar No. 210549) E-mail: rhilbert@manatt.com NOEL S. COHEN (California Bar No. 219645) E-mail: ncohen@manatt.com 1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 Telephone: (650) 812-1300 Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. LEWIS T. LECLAIR (Bar No. CA 077136) E-mail: lleclair@mckoolsmith.com JILL ADLER (Bar No. CA 150783) E-mail: jadler@mckoolsmith.com 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Facsimile: (214) 978-4044 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. C07 0943 WHA
BERNARD PAUL PARRISH, HERBERT ANTHONY ADDERLEY, and WALTER ROBERTS, III on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs vs. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, a Virginia corporation, and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED d/b/a PLAYERS INC, a Virginia corporation,
[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS [CIVIL L.R. 79-5]
Defendants.
PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C:07-0943 WHA
20189354.1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-00943-WHA
Document 144
Filed 10/03/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Plaintiffs have requested an Order sealing documents, information and testimony relating to their Motion to File Third Amended Complaint and, specifically, the Third Amended Complaint for Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, an Accounting and Violation of California Business & Professions Code § 17200, and exhibits D, F, G, I, J, and O attached thereto and filed concurrently with the Motion for Leave to File same, and the Declaration of Ronald S. Katz in Support of the Motion to File Third Amended Complaint filed concurrently therewith. ("Motion for Leave"). As set forth in the Declaration of Ryan S. Hilbert submitted in support of Plaintiffs' request to file under seal, the documents named above contain information and testimony, or are documents, that Defendants have designated as "Highly Confidential Attorneys Eyes Only." Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d), Plaintiffs have submitted a Miscellaneous Administrative Request to file this document under seal. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Civil L.R. 79-5(d), and the Court's inherent authority over the papers filed in this Court, the following documents are to be sealed: (A) An unredacted version of Motion for Leave to File the Third Amended
Complaint; (B) An unredacted version of the Third Amended Complaint (filed as an
attachment to the Motion for Leave to File); (C) Exhibits D, F, G, I, J, and O to the Third Amended Complaint (filed as
an attachment to the Motion for Leave to File); and. (D) An unredacted version of the Declaration of Ronald S. Katz in Support
of the Motion for Leave to File the Third Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: __________________, 2007 October 3
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
26 27 28
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW PALO A L T O
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
_______________________________ lsup illiam A Judge W Honorable William H. Alsup
FO
NO
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
FO
Judge William
Alsup
R NIA
IT IS SO
ORDERED
20189354.1
2
R NIA
IT IS S
RT U O
NO
O ORD
ERED
RT U O
RT
H
RT
H
PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C:07-0943 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?