Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated

Filing 398

*** FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE DOCKET # 399 . *** STIPULATION -- Stipulation Regarding Testimony of Joel Linzner -- by Bernard Paul Parrish, Walter Roberts, III, Herbert Anthony Adderley. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Hilbert, Ryan) (Filed on 9/19/2008) Modified on 9/22/2008 (ewn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated Doc. 398 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Todd Padnos (Bar No. 208202) tpadnos@dl.com DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 951-1100; Fax: (415) 951-1180 Jeffrey L. Kessler (pro hac vice) jkessler@dl.com David G. Feher (pro hac vice) dfeher@dl.com David Greenspan (pro hac vice) dgreenspan@dl.com DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP 1301 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Tel: (212) 259-8000; Fax: (212) 259-6333 Attorneys for Defendants. Ronald S. Katz (Bar No. CA 085713) rkatz@manatt.com Ryan S. Hilbert (Bar No. CA 210549) rhilbert@manatt.com Noel S. Cohen (Bar No. CA 219645) ncohen@manatt.com MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 East Palo Alto, CA 94303-1006 Tel: (650) 812-1300; Fax: (650) 213-0260 Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Kenneth L. Steinthal (pro hac vice) kenneth.steinthal@weil.com claire.goldstein@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: (650) 802-3000; Fax: (650) 802-3100 Bruce S. Meyer (pro hac vice) bruce.meyer@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 Tel: (212) 310-8000; Fax: (212) 310-8007 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP Lewis T. LeClair (Bar No. CA 077136) lleclair@mckoolsmith.com Jill Adler (Bar No. CA 150783) jadler@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: (214) 978-4984; Fax: (214) 978-4044 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BERNARD PAUL PARRISH, HERBERT ANTHONY ADDERLEY, WALTER ROBERTS III, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED d/b/a/ PLAYERS INC, Defendants. Case No. C 07 0943 WHA STIPULATION REGARDING TESTIMONY OF JOEL LINZNER Stipulation Regarding Testimony of Joel Linzner Dallas 263996v5 Civ. Action No. C07 0943 WHA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Defendants National Football League Players Association and National Football League Players Incorporated d/b/a/ Players Inc (collectively, "Defendants"), and Plaintiffs Bernard Paul Parrish, Herbert Anthony Adderley, and Walter Roberts III (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), hereby respectfully submit this Stipulation regarding the timing of testimony of third-party witness Joel Linzner of Electronic Arts, Inc., ("EA") and the authenticity and/or admissibility of specific evidence relating to EA: STIPULATION WHEREAS, Joel Linzner, an employee of Electronic Arts, Inc. ("EA"), has been deposed in this matter; WHEREAS, Mr. Linzner is within the subpoena power of this Court and has been subpoenaed by Plaintiffs to appear at the trial beginning October 20 and to testify during Plaintiffs' case in chief; WHEREAS, counsel for EA has advised counsel for the parties that Mr. Linzner has a long scheduled trip to Europe planned for the week of October 20, but will return on October 27; and WHEREAS, Mr. Linzner is identified on Defendants' Pretrial Disclosures as a witness Defendants expect to call. NOW THEREFORE the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that: (1) (2) Plaintiffs shall withdraw their subpoena on Mr. Linzner requiring his appearance on October 20; Plaintiffs shall withdraw any and all other subpoenas previously served upon EA (including the subpoena requiring EA to produce certain documents and things on October 20), and Plaintiffs agree that they will not seek to issue any other subpoena directed at EA or any EA witness in connection with their case in chief in this matter, with the parties reserving their respective rights in connection with Plaintiffs' ability to call an EA witness in a rebuttal case, if any; Notwithstanding the above, Plaintiffs shall serve Mr. Linzner with a new subpoena requiring his appearance at 8:00 a.m. on October 29, 2008; 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP (3) Stipulation Regarding Testimony of Joel Linzner Dallas 263996v5 Civ. Action No. C07 0943 WHA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 (4) The parties agree that Mr. Linzner's testimony may be taken out of order, and Plaintiffs may call him as a witness on October 29, and the parties shall work with the Court to schedule his testimony efficiently on that day. Mr. Linzner shall be called as a witness only once during the trial, and Plaintiffs may examine him first, but Defendants' examination of Mr. Linzner shall not be limited by the scope of Plaintiffs' examination and may cover any subject that is otherwise permissible; Defendants agree that Plaintiffs may read or play video excerpts from the deposition of Mr. Linzner during their case in chief as though he were "unavailable" under Rule 804(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and Defendants shall be allowed to counter-designate excerpts; EA has agreed to provide to Plaintiffs, two days after the complete execution of this stipulation, a copy of the original May 31, 2001, letter received by EA from LaShun Lawson attached as Exhibit "A" hereto (PI 131529-30), and Defendants agree to the authenticity of such original letter, and, without waiving any other objection Defendants may have as to the admissibility of such original letter, and without waiving Plaintiffs' right to seek to offer such letter into evidence in their case in chief, that such original letter constitutes statements by an employee of a party within the scope of her employment within the meaning of FRE 801(d)(2)(D); Defendants agree to the authenticity of a document attached as Exhibit "B" hereto (EA000153-56) evidencing an email chain between and among EA personnel and employees of the Defendants spanning from June 2005 to August 2005, and, without waiving any other objection Defendants may have as to the admissibility of all or any portion of such document, and without waiving Plaintiffs' right to seek to offer such email chain into evidence in their case in chief, that the portions of the email chain in the document that constitute emails from LaShun Lawson constitute statements by an employee of a party within the scope of her employment within the meaning of FRE 801(d)(2)(D), and that the portions of the email chain in the document that constitute emails from EA personnel were communications made within the scope of such person's duties for EA; Defendants agree that the list of Madden NFL games attached as Exhibit "C" are authentic and admissible in evidence and that such games may be used by Plaintiffs at any time during their case in chief. (5) (6) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// (8) (7) Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP IT IS SO STIPULATED. -2Stipulation Regarding Testimony of Joel Linzner Civ. Action No. C07 0943 WHA Dallas 263996v5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Respectfully Submitted, Date: Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP BY: _ /S/Jeffrey L. Kessler _______ Jeffrey L. Kessler Attorneys for Defendants Date: Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP BY: _ /S/___________ _______ Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: Electronic Arts, Inc. BY: _ /S/___________ _______ Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP Jake Schatz, Vice President Legal -3Stipulation Regarding Testimony of Joel Linzner Civ. Action No. C07 0943 WHA Dallas 263996v5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?