Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated

Filing 443

Proposed Order re 438 Declaration in Support, 441 Declaration in Support, 436 MOTION in Limine DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7, 440 Memorandum in Opposition, by National Football League Players Incorporated, National Football League Players Association. (Padnos, Todd) (Filed on 10/8/2008)

Download PDF
Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated Doc. 443 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BERNARD PAUL PARRISH, HERBERT ANTHONY ADDERLEY, WALTER ROBERTS III, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED d/b/a/ PLAYERS INC, Defendants. The Court, having considered Defendants' Motion in Limine No.7 to exclude any evidence or allegations regarding EA's alleged scrambling of certain retired player images in the Madden NFL video game, including any allegations that Defendants conspired with EA or are other responsible or liable for EA's alleged conduct, and all papers filed herein, and good cause appearing, hereby orders as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 7 is GRANTED in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: , 2008 The Honorable William H. Alsup United States District Court Judge Date: Time: Ctrm: 9 Judge: William H. Alsup Case No. C 07 0943 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP [Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 7 Civ. Action No. C07 0943 WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?