Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated
Filing
657
RESPONSE to Objections and Class Counsels' Objection to Participation By Non-Class Members in Any Phase of the Settlement Proceedings by Herbert Anthony Adderley. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Katz, Ronald) (Filed on 11/5/2009)
Exhibit 1 to the Class Counsels' Response to Objections and Class Counsels' Objection to Participation by Non-Class Members in Any Phase of the Settlement Proceedings
Name
Class Member
Don Herrmann
Yes
Michael T. Bass
Yes
J. Bruce Jarvis
Yes
Paul R. Flatley
Yes
Gale Gillingham
Yes
Bobby Franklin
No
Dave Pear
Yes
W illiam R. Mack
No
Albert Guntuden
No
Summary of Objection Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two.
Name
Class Member
Preston Carpenter
Yes
Roy Jefferson
Yes
Bill Truax
Yes
LeRoy Kelly
Yes
David B. Olerich
No
Jon Arnett
No
Bob Lurtsema
Yes
Johnny E. Roland
Yes
Norm Bulaich
Yes
Summary of Objection Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two.
Name
Class Member
Pat Matson
No
Clyde L. Werner
No
Ted Kwalick
No
Richard J. Camarillo
Yes
Charles L. Johnson
No
Ronald D. Pritchard
Yes
Frank H. Nunley
Yes
Gerald Philbin
Yes
Robert J. Scholtz
Yes
Summary of Objection Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two.
Name
Class Member
Anthony R. Franklin
No
Dick Bielski
No
Larry Kaminski
Yes
Marvin Fleming
No
Marvin Cobb
No
George Visger
No
Douglas Wilkerson
No
Carl Brettschneider John Bramlett Bernard Parrish
Yes No No
Summary of Objection Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Includes synopsis of medical history and past litigation related to medical injury while playing for the 49ers. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. [form letter is not signed] Dues paying member who was not included in the current litigation. Believes that numerous other retired members were not included on the class member list. Requests copy of August 4, 2009 amendment.
Name
Michael Sandusky Billy Ray Barnes
Kevin House
R. Gern Nagler
Searlier y of Objection Class Member Believes Electronic Arts was released in ummarversions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Includes synopsis of medical/work history. Yes Member of Bert Bell pension plan and NFLPA but was excluded from the group of players receiving a portion of the financial settlement. No Submitted a signed GLA but was excluded from list of retired players receiving a portion of the financial settlement. Disagrees with the reported number of retired players (2,062) and the amount of damages awarded. No Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Yes Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. Supports settlement, noting it represents 93.4% of jury verdict. Supports settlement, noting the money he receives will be useful States the settlement documents are bewildering and that he is upset with the settlement. Contains numerous unattributed comments about settlement. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two. Believes Electronic Arts was released in earlier versions of the Settlement Agreement. Does not agree with damages calculation based on information provided by NFLPA. Requests recalculation of damages based on expert witnesses Rowley and Rascher's financial reports. The settlement should be one payment, instead of two.
Doug Cosbie Jeff Nixon Troy Auzenne Bernard Parrish No name given
Yes Yes Yes No Unknown
Jason Suttle
Yes
Raymond Berry
No
Kevin House
No
Thomas S. "Tim" Van Galder
No
Name
Class Member
Edward M. Khayat Robert C. Khayat
No No
Summary of Objection Dues paying member who was not included in the current litigation. Believes that numerous other retired members were not included on the class member list, and that some class members should not be included. Dues paying member who was not included in the current litigation. Believes that numerous other retired members were not included on the class member list.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?