Miller et al v. Rupf et al
Filing
74
ORDER extending discovery cutoffs. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs have requested the court continue the fact and expert discovery cutoffs to allow plaintiffs' counsel to undergo eye surgery. Doc #70. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the The new fact discovery cutoff shall be JENNIFER MILLER, et al, Plaintiffs, v WARREN E RUPF, et al, Defendants. / No C 07-01137 VRW Related to C-02-02831 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
requested continuance. October 30, 2009.
If the parties wish to postpone expert discovery until after the dispositive motion hearing scheduled for December 10, 2009, they may by joint agreement do so. shall be as follows: Otherwise, the schedule
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Designation of experts and production of expert reports Designation of rebuttal experts and production of rebuttal expert reports Expert discovery cutoff
September 15, 2009 October 15, 2009 November 13, 2009
IT IS SO ORDERED.
VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
