Jackson v. Horel

Filing 30

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Jackson v. Horel

Doc. 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH JACKSON, Petitioner, v. ROBERT HOREL, warden, Respondent. /

No. C 07-1334 SI (pr) ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal from the order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus that challenged a parole denial decision. Under the recent decision of Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 554 (9th Cir. 2010), a petitioner must obtain a certificate of appealability to appeal such a decision. A certificate of appealability will not issue because petitioner has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). This is not a case in which "reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 19, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com