Eshelman et al v. Othoclear Holdings, Inc. et al
Filing
155
ORDER Requiring Submission. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on February 4, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL B. ESHELMAN, D.D.S.; PETER F. SILCHER, D.D.S.; and LORI SILCHER, Plaintiffs, v. ORTHOCLEAR HOLDINGS, INC. et al., Defendants. / In considering Defendants' motions to dismiss the third amended complaint, the Court would be greatly assisted by the submission of a side-by-side comparison of the relevant portions, or a redline version, of the third amended consolidated complaint, filed on July 24, 2007, and the second amended complaint, filed on February 19, 2008. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall submit such a comparison, preferably a redline version, of the two complaints by February 6, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER No. C 07-1429 JSW
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
