Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1077

ORDER APPROVING SUPERSEDEAS BOND PURSUANT TO RULE 62 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE re 1076 Proposed Order, filed by SAP AG, Tomorrownow Inc, SAP America Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/22/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2011)

1
2
3
4

5

6
7

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359)
Jason McDonell (SBN 115084)
Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26 th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784)
Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776)
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JONES DAY
717 Texas, Suite 3300
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and
TOMORROWNOW, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

OAKLAND DIVISION
21

ORACLE USA, INC., et aI.,

22

Plaintiffs,

23

v.

24

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
SUPERSEDEAS BOND PURSUANT
TO RULE 62 OF THE FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

SAP AG, et aI.,

25

Defendants.

26
27
28
SVI-94462vl

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SUPERSEDEAS BOND
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

1

2
3

Having considered Defendants' Request for Approval of Signed Supersedeas Bond
Pursuant to Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Exhibit A thereto:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants' request is GRANTED. The signed

4

supersedeas bond attached as Exhibit A to Defendants' Request for Approval of Signed

5

Supersedeas Bond Pursuant to Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is approved and,

6

as set forth in the Court's April 29, 2011 Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Stay of

7

Execution of Judgment Through Appeal and Approval of Proposed Security Pursuant to FRCP 62

8

(ECF No. 1069), execution of final judgment is stayed pending disposition of post-judgment

9

motions and, if necessary, appeal.

10
11

12
13

RT

ER

Hamilton

A

H

17

Judge P

R NIA

hyllis J.

NO

16

- - -IT IS S-J.DER- - - - - - - - - O OR- ED
Hon. Phyllis Hamilton
FO

By:

LI

_

UNIT
ED

DATED: 6/22/11

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

15

S

14

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23

24
25
26

27
28
SVI-94462vl

- 1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SUPERSEDEAS BOND
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)