Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1097

Declaration of Jane L. Froyd in Support of 1096 Statement Declaration of Jane L. Froyd in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Amended Motion for Leave to Intervene filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) 1096 ) (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 12/7/2011)

UNITED
COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
8
9

10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
ORACLE USA, INC., et aI.,

v.

15

SAP AG, et aI.,

16

MOVANTS AMENDED MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO INTERENVE
Date: December 8, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 3, 3rd Floor
Judge:Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

Plaintiffs,

13
14

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Defendants.

17
18

AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE.

19
20
21

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

22
23
24

A.

On May 28th, 1969 Plaintiff (Wells Fargo of

Minnesota, CitiBank of Poland, Chase Bank and

OTHER

1

case

R

ex C

sa d ti Ie

2-

"
field"

ease see

ra

d

a

10

"

led on Jun 29, 2010.)

act under both State and
9

a

s

deral

"

Id
s is a
CO and 1

fraud laws.
B.

On July 8th, 1969 Plaintiff (Norwest Bank of

11
12

Minnesota, CitiBank of Poland, Chase Bank and OTHER

13
14
15

EAST COAST ORGANIZATIONS) or one of their successors
one of its agents

0

(Fisher & Shapiro, LLC., Darryl

16

17
18

Rosengweig, Noah Weininger, Mark R. Cummisford &
Maupin)

files a Quit Claim Deed with Lake County (R

19
20
21

C000106 in case 02-08-1160 and R in case 02-06- ) said
title is in fact a very Complex Cold War Era Ponzi

22

23
24

Scheme (please see USA vs. "Richard Murphy", "Cynthia
Murphy" and USA vs. "Donald Howard Heathfield" filed

T

T

I

or one of

I

r &

one of its

successors

ro,

ig &

r,

in

i

Cross-Cla

5

6
7

Pla

iff's

er i

residential prope

0

an mort

y and Cross-Cla

r an
Plaintiff's

8

9
10

purchase a land trust with tenements (See Exhibit B.)
D.

On October 05, 1996 Cross-Claim Plaintiffs get

11
12

married while living in Park Ridge, IL (see 08 CH

13
14

17067.)

15
16
17
18

E.

On, December 01, 1998 Plaintiff( Norwest Bank, Ban

of Minnesota, CitiBank of Poland and

OTHER EAST COAST

19
20
21

ORGANIZATIONS) or one of their successors or one of its
agents (Fisher & Shapiro, LLC., Noah Weininger &

22
23
24

25

Maupin) and Cross-Claim Plaintiff's refinance old
mortgage into new first mortgage contract for an

scons

k of

Citi
I
7

one of its agents

iff

a

11, 2 01

it B

See

llate

2

1

of

lls
se

.

k

IONS) or one of their successors or
sher & Shapiro, LLC., Noah

8

9
10

Weininger, Darryl Rosengweig & Maupin) and Cross-Claim
Defendants enter into a second mortgage contract for an

11
12

residential property (See Exhibit B) .

13
14
15

H.

On July 27, 2001 Plaintiff (Wells Fargo of

Minnesota, CitiBank of Poland and

OTHER EAST COAST

16
17
18

ORGANIZATIONS) or one of their successors or one of its
agents

(Fisher & Shapiro, LLC., Noah Weininger, Darryl

19

20
21

Rosengweig & Maupin) claims to own Cross-Claim
Plaintiff's house and knocks it down(R C000092 of Wells

22
23
24

vs. Myers and Myers vs. Lake County I

(05 L 884). Kumar

of Lake County Zoning Board is a lSI mole and does

7

8

9
10

existence of Intellectual substance and copyrighted
this and other products (see 05 L 885 this case is

11
12

still pending.)

13
14
15

K. In 2007 This Court errs

(see 07 P 8382) by taking

money for the Cross Claim Plaintiffs a moves to enfor

16
17
18

illegal patronage in violation of a Fed Court order
is the cause of two deaths and also violates of the

19
20
21

Copyrighted products from the 2005 case above. Also,
Oracle sues SAP in 2007, over same matters.

22
23

L. When Mr. Tyler's will of 1994 was destroyed by the

24

criminal
25

erprise (a.k.a. CO-Cross-Claim-Defendants

vs.

I AL

and USA vs. BASHIR NOORZAI. & USA vs.

8

9
10

MADOFF & USA vs. Rezko & USA vs. Blagojevich & USA vs.
MADOFF & Washington Mutual Bank vs. Myers 2nd Appellat

11

sconsin and a violation of The Federal Court Order

12

13
14

15

commonly known as the Shakman Decree to Monitor
Patronage in Cook County

16
17
18

M.

On January 23, 2008 cross-claim plaintiff's filed

for Chapter 11 and then were partial and forcibly

19
20
21

converted to chapter 7 bankruptcy (see 08 B 01439.)
hearing of the creditors was given by the US Chapter 7

22
23

24

25

trustee after the forced conversion because The Court
appointed Trustee from Lake County recused themselves

te

st

i

see 0

of

Est

ion

P 83 2

ESTATE AND

e)

11

sely

, 13 2009

F.

e of

S,

Marlon Suskin and Wells Fargo of Minnesota,

8

9
10

CitiBank of Poland and

OTHER EAST COAST ORGANIZATIONS)

or one of their successors or one of its agents

(Fishe

11
12

& Shapiro, LLC., Noah Weininger, Darryl Rosengweig &

13
14

15

Maupin)

from 19263 forest lane the house in Mundelein,

but not W232 which is the land trust, and NBLT # 724

16
17

18

and M. & R. Lake Corp. are terminated!

(see R - late

page of motion to dismiss and brief (wells vs. Myers)

19

20
21

O.

On February 13, 2009 CROSS-CLAIM PLAINTIFF'S make

an entry under the terms of Gridley into Marriott and

22
23
24
25

Hilton in Mettawa, IL. and serve them see service them
on or about July 2nd, 2009 the with Lake County sherif

1 office.
St

O.

es

s on
of
7

torne

error

is

tre

4, 2 09

ly 20th, 2009 was not

r

jurisdi

ss

ion of

lake county court and was under this court's order of

8
9

10

leave to amend.
P.

All Treaties between the USA and the Indian nation

11
12

applies to the land (see MONTANA v. UNITED STATES, 450

13
14
15

U.S. 544

(1981)

& (R C0000141 in case 02-

450 U.S. 544)

08-1160)

16
17
18

Q. On July 5th, 2009 Defendant's make a valid entry

into Lincolnshire LLC. and serve them (see service

19
20
21

affidavit filed on April 4, 2011) on or about July
16th, 2009 with The Lincolnshire Police as a witness.

22
23
24

This service is within the time of the original leave
granted by this court on this matter and also still in

k

s case.

S. See
T.

r of 4/27/11
18, 2010

training camps in
9

10

case 07ey

kistan ope

tt
ed by

1658 P

(E
att

shkar e

Tayyiba, a designated foreign terrorist organization,
on five separate occasions between 2002 and 2005. In

11
12

late 2005, Headley received instructions from three

13
14
15

members of Lashkar to travel to India to conduct
surveillance, which he did five times leading up to the

16
17
18

Mumbai attacks three years later that killed six
Americans among approximately 164 people and wounded

19
20

21

hundreds more.

u.

On August 10, 2010 Marling Management Inc. sends a

22
23
24
25

new corrected and typed lease to Cross-claim plaintiffs
(See 11LN795) Which is a prope

y owned by Cross-Claim

ss-

rs,

now comes,

re

s

a

5

6
7

II.

UNJUST ENRICHMENT

9
10

0.)

All items of part I are herein re-asserted.

11
12
13
14
15

1.)

CROSS CLAIM DEFENDANTS do not have clear title

to the land under Gridley land contract (See Wells

16
17
18

Fargo vs. Myers, 2nd Appellate Illinois and Washington
Mutual Bank vs. Myers 2nd Appellate Wisconsin & Exhibit

19
20
21

A) insofar as, any deed written under the illegal
criminal enterprise and the illegal patronage system

22
23
24

see the state of Illinois vs. WELLS Case Number (09-CH26434)

filed July 31 2009.

25

are

1

6
7
8

9
10

III. FRAUD, RACKETEERING, MALPRACTICE, breach of both
the TAP contract and Shakman Decree.

11

12

0.)

All items of part I are herein re-asserted.

1.)

When Mr. Tyler's will of 1994 was destroyed by the

13
14

15

criminal enterprise (a.k.a. CO-CROSS-CLAIM-Defendants

16
17
18

ROBERT F. HARRIS, PLENARY GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE AND
Marlon Suskin and Wells Fargo of Minnesota, CitiBank

0

19
20

21

Poland, Chase Bank and OTHER EAST COAST ORGANIZATIONS)
or one of their successors or one of its agents

(Fishe

22
23

24

25

& Shapiro, LLC., Noah Weininger, Darryl Rosengweig &
Maupin) it is a criminal act under state and federal

on

s

a

01

1

ion of

own as

rs

k vs.

11

ral
cree to

e

r

itor

in Cook County.
7

2 .)

M&R

ke Corp and Northbrook Land trust #724 are

8
9

10

not Illinois Corporations as is alleged the fraudulent
deeds

(see Myers vs. Lake County I & II & Wells Fargo

11
12

vs. Myers, 2nd Appellate Illinois & Washington Mutual

13
14
15

Bank vs. Myers 2nd Appellate Wisconsin (see Exhibit A &
Exhibit B) violating of the conveyance act section 765

16
17
18

ILCS 940/50 and Fraud to operate a ponzi sheme on the
land.

19
20

21

3.)

Kumar of Lake County Zoning Board (and lSI mole.)

knocks down Cross-Claim plaintiffs house in July 2001.

22
23

24

This is criminal destructions of property.
4.)

It is one Illinois MALPRACTICE to have non-

I

i

se

s

,
l

10

1.)

ase

of owner.

All items of
9

to

cree

of

is

I are herein re-asse

ed.

It is a violation of the land contract to operate

ponzi sheme on the land "no tenant (CROSS CLAIM

11
12

DEFENDANTS) ... may use the land to violate any state or

13
14
15

federal laws" ( see USA vs. MADOFF & USA vs. Rezko and
see West Shore Park vs. Myers & Myers vs. Lake County I

16
17
18

& II - 2nd Appellate Illinois & Wells Fargo vs. Myers,
2nd Appellate Illinois & Washington Mutual Bank vs.

19
20
21

Myers 2nd Appellate Wisconsin and (See Exhibit A &
Exhibit B)

22
23
24

2.)

Kumar of Lake County Zoning Board (and an lSI mole)

does knock down Cross-Claim plaintiffs house in July

s

c cr

I Is

ss

a

se

f

les

us X
II era

e

ors

t
are

us

of Islam

lovers of an
9

.. I

ant

us XII, NAZI,

Islam, Vatican II & communist.

10
11
12

V.

EJECTMENT

13

1.)

15

All items of part I are herein re-asserted.

2.

14

None of the Cross-Claim Defendants own the I

16
17
18

and an Ejectment action of all cross-claim defendants
is herein commenced.

19
20

21

VI.

TWO COUNTS OF WRONG FULL DEATH

1.)

All items of part I are herein re-asserted.

2.)

None of the Cross-Claim Defendants were the

22
23
24

executors of Lens will they were his and Moms

s

o. )
1.)

1 items of

I are

re

It is one Illinois confli
non-

sclosed associ

ion

re-asse
of

ed.

erest laws to
en

ini

r

Maupin.
7

2.)

There is a real cost of over $2,000.00 plus cost

0

8
9

Maupin not doing a motion to dismiss when we told him

10

to.
11
12

Where for the Defendant prays for the following relief,

13
14
15

A.

$65,000,000,000.00

B.

65,000,000 entries in the claim index at $1,000

16
17
18

for each piece of property claimed to be owned by CROS

19
20
21

CLAIM DEFENDANT (see Exhibit A)
C. Until above named cross-claim defendants open up

22
23

24

books on the WWII Pius XII matters then no radio
station can quote any other documents that said named

s.

St.

solen

D.
prope

y of Cross-Claim

e

elle

1

real

s.

8
9

10

E.

Ejectment of above names lovers Islam & Ponzi

inside the Temple of David now called dome of the rock.

11
12
13
14
15

F.

US Army Hardware may enter any seminary under the

command Illinois National Guard Woman's auxiliary Tank

16

17
18

Battalion(s) .
G. No new construction on any farm until 100% of the

19
20
21

rust belt is restored.
H.

Where ever other relief this court deems

22
23

24
25

appropriate.
Terry M. Myers

rs
Pro232

st
lein, IL.

Twitter terrymmyers
8
9

10

Skype name mr.terry.m.myers
Telephone:

[phone]

Facsimile:

(206)

11
12

600-7361

13

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

[e-mail]