Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
USCA Case Number 12-15482 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for 1111 Notice of Appeal filed by Terry M. Myers. (kk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2012)
Page: 1 of 3
Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
March 07, 2012
Oracle Corporation, et al v. Terry Myers, et al
A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of
the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of
Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must
indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with
this court regarding this case.
Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an
order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court
reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court.
The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal
have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable
FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the
appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic
dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
Payment of the $455.00 U.S. Court of Appeals docket fee is past due. Appellant
shall correct this deficiency within 14 days. Failure to respond to this order within
the time set out will result in the dismissal of the appeal for failure to prosecute.
See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The fee is payable to the Clerk of the District Court, the Tax
Court or the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
Appellants who are filing pro se should refer to the accompanying
information sheet regarding the filing of informal briefs.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Page: 2 of 3
MAR 07 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation; ORACLE USA INC., a
Colorado corporation; ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a
California corporation; ORACLE
SYSTEMS CORPORATION; ORACLE
EMEA LIMITED; J.D. EDWARDS
EUROPE LIMITED; SIEBEL
D.C. No. 4:07-cv-01658-PJH
U.S. District Court for Northern
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
TERRY M. MYERS,
Intervenor - Appellant,
SAP AG, a German corporation; SAP
AMERICA INC., a Delaware
corporation; TOMORROWNOW INC., a
Defendants - Appellees.
The parties shall meet the following time schedule.
Page: 3 of 3
If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported
hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply.
Mon., April 2, 2012
Transcript shall be ordered.
Mon., April 30, 2012
Transcript shall be filed by court reporter.
Mon., June 11, 2012
Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shall
be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir.
Wed., July 11, 2012
Appellees' answering brief and excerpts of record
shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and
9th Cir. R. 32-1.
The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen
days of service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R.
Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in
automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
FOR THE COURT:
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?