Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1115

USCA Case Number 12-15482 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for 1111 Notice of Appeal filed by Terry M. Myers. (kk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2012)

Download PDF
Case: 12-15482 03/07/2012 ID: 8093530 DktEntry: 1-2 Page: 1 of 3 Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 415-355-8000 Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court No.: D.C. No.: Short Title: March 07, 2012 12-15482 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Oracle Corporation, et al v. Terry Myers, et al Dear Appellant/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Payment of the $455.00 U.S. Court of Appeals docket fee is past due. Appellant shall correct this deficiency within 14 days. Failure to respond to this order within the time set out will result in the dismissal of the appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The fee is payable to the Clerk of the District Court, the Tax Court or the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Appellants who are filing pro se should refer to the accompanying information sheet regarding the filing of informal briefs. Case: 12-15482 03/07/2012 ID: 8093530 DktEntry: 1-2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Page: 2 of 3 FILED MAR 07 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; ORACLE USA INC., a Colorado corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a California corporation; ORACLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION; ORACLE EMEA LIMITED; J.D. EDWARDS EUROPE LIMITED; SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC., No. 12-15482 D.C. No. 4:07-cv-01658-PJH U.S. District Court for Northern California, Oakland TIME SCHEDULE ORDER Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. TERRY M. MYERS, Intervenor - Appellant, v. SAP AG, a German corporation; SAP AMERICA INC., a Delaware corporation; TOMORROWNOW INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants - Appellees. The parties shall meet the following time schedule. Case: 12-15482 03/07/2012 ID: 8093530 DktEntry: 1-2 Page: 3 of 3 If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply. Mon., April 2, 2012 Transcript shall be ordered. Mon., April 30, 2012 Transcript shall be filed by court reporter. Mon., June 11, 2012 Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Wed., July 11, 2012 Appellees' answering brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Gerald Rosen Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?