Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Filing
1157
Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of 1156 Opposition/Response to Motion Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of Defendants' Oppositions to Oracle's Motions in Limine filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23)(Related document(s) 1156 ) (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 5/10/2012)
EXHIBIT 3
PAUL K. MEYER
May 14, 2010
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 648
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ORACLE CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation,
ORACLE USA, INC., a
Colorado corporation, and
ORACLE INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, a California
corporation,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
) No. 07-CV-1658 (PJH)
)
SAP AG, a German
)
corporation, SAP AMERICA,
)
INC., a Delaware
)
corporation, TOMORROWNOW,
)
INC., a Texas corporation,
)
and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________)
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
PAUL K. MEYER
_________________________________
VOLUME 3; PAGES 648 - 937
FRIDAY, MAY 14, 2010
HIGHLY
REPORTED BY:
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
HOLLY THUMAN, CSR No. 6834, RMR, CRR
(1-427378)
Merrill Legal Solutions
(800) 869-9132
c27f64cd-287e-4b3a-a890-1b27136d3d6a
PAUL K. MEYER
May 14, 2010
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 712
TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT TO MOTION
10:40:53
24
10:40:56
25
Q.
As someone who by your background and
experience is not an enterprise software industry
Merrill Legal Solutions
(800) 869-9132
c27f64cd-287e-4b3a-a890-1b27136d3d6a
PAUL K. MEYER
May 14, 2010
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 713
10:41:00
1
expert or an expert on industry enterprise software
10:41:05
2
customer purchasing practices, do you believe
10:41:07
3
you're qualified to respond to Mr. Clarke's report
10:41:10
4
in that regard?
10:41:12
5
MS. HOUSE:
10:41:13
6
THE WITNESS:
10:41:13
7
question, from the issue which I am expert in,
10:41:16
8
which is the high technology area and determining
10:41:19
9
damages and valuation and doing analysis and have
10:41:22
10
looked at hundreds of technology companies,
10:41:24
11
absolutely I'm qualified to do the analysis I've
10:41:26
12
done.
10:41:28
13
that background to do these types of analyses,
10:41:32
14
because these are driven by the facts and
10:41:34
15
circumstances of this case.
Objection.
Vague.
If I understand your
And I don't believe it takes someone with
TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT TO MOTION
Merrill Legal Solutions
(800) 869-9132
c27f64cd-287e-4b3a-a890-1b27136d3d6a
TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT TO MOTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?