Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 1120 Motion for Clarification; denying 1122 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration; denying 1124 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,
SAP AG, et al.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 07-1658 PJH
The motion of plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al., (“Oracle”) for clarification is DENIED,
as the court does not agree that there is anything in the September 1, 2011 and September
16, 2011 orders that requires clarification. The court refers Oracle to the discussion in the
September 1, 2011 order at 10-15. To the extent that the motion for clarification is
intended as a motion for leave to seek reconsideration of the September 1, 2011 and
September 16, 2011 orders, it is DENIED for failure to comply with the requirements of Civil
Local Rule 7-9.
Oracle’s motion for leave to seek reconsideration of the November 8, 2010 order
excluding evidence of lost cross-sell and up-sell evidence, and motion for leave to seek
reconsideration of the September 30, 2010 order excluding evidence of saved development
costs, are DENIED as moot in light of the ruling on the motion for clarification, and also for
failure to comply with the requirements of Civil Local Rule 7-9.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 15, 2012
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?