Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1185

Proposed Order re 1182 [Plaintiff's Proposed] Order Regarding Admission of Exhibits by Oracle International Corporation. (Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 6/5/2012) Modified on 6/7/2012 (vlk, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257)
GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468)
BREE HANN (SBN 215695)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)
FRED NORTON (SBN 224725)
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)
JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227)
500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7144
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oracle International Corp.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

20
21
22

ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

23

v.

24

No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
ADMISSION OF EXHIBITS

SAP AG, et al.,

25

Defendants.

26
27
28
NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADMISSION OF EXHIBITS
A/74962998.1

1

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Statement Regarding Exhibit Objections.

2

Having reviewed the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments, evidence and

3

relevant legal authority, the Court hereby rules as follows:

4

I.

5

DEFENDANTS’ “CATEGORY” ONE - ALLEGED HEARSAY
EXCEPTIONS/EXEMPTIONS
Defendants’ Trial Exhibits A-0059 (At-Risk Report), A-0367, A-5002-1, A-5042, A-

6
7

5058, A-5193, A-5995, A-5997, A-6042-1, A-6205-1, and A-6329-1 are wholly or partially

8

INADMISSIBLE.

9
10

II.

11

DEFENDANTS’ “CATEGORY” TWO - ALLEGED EVIDENCE OF
WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
Oracle’s Trial Exhibits PTX 0008, PTX 0014, and PTX 0161 are ADMISSIBLE.

12
13

III.

14

Oracle’s Trial Exhibits PTX 0012, PTX 0024, PTX 0161, PTX 0960, PTX 4809, PTX

15
16

DEFENDANTS’ “CATEGORY” THREE - EVIDENCE
ALLEGEDLY RELATING TO EXCLUDED DAMAGES
THEORIES

4819, and PTX 7028 are ADMISSIBLE.

17
18

IV.

PLAINTIFF’S “CATEGORY” ONE - ORACLE INCOME
STATEMENTS AND CANCELLATION REPORTS

19

Oracle’s PTX 8040 and PTX 2582 are ADMISSIBLE business records under Fed. R.

20

Evid. 803(6).

21
22

V.

23

PLAINTIFF’S “CATEGORY” TWO - POST-TRIAL
STATEMENTS BY SAP EXECUTIVES
PTX 8112 and PTX 8111 are ADMISSIBLE.

24
25
26
27

VI.

PLAINTIFF’S “CATEGORY” THREE - STATEMENTS FROM TN
PLEA AGREEMENT
Admissions contained within PTX 8108, the TomorrowNow, Inc. plea agreement,

without reference to the plea itself, are ADMISSIBLE.

28
1
NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADMISSION OF EXHIBITS
A/74962998.1

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

DATED: _______________, 2012
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADMISSION OF EXHIBITS
A/74962998.1