Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1219

USCA Case Number 12-16944 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for 1218 Notice of Appeal, filed by Oracle Systems Corporation, J.D. Edwards Europe Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Oracle EMEA Limited, Siebel Systems, Inc.. (kk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)

Case: 12-16944

09/04/2012

ID: 8308854

DktEntry: 1-2

Page: 1 of 3

Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court

No.:
D.C. No.:
Short Title:

September 04, 2012

12-16944
4:07-cv-01658-PJH
ORACLE CORP., et al v. SAP AG, et al

Dear Appellants/Counsel
A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of
the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of
Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must
indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with
this court regarding this case.
Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an
order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court
reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court.
The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal
have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable
FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the
appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic
dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1.

Case: 12-16944

09/04/2012

ID: 8308854

DktEntry: 1-2

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Page: 2 of 3

FILED
SEP 04 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delware
corporation; ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION;
ORACLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION;
ORACLE USA INC.; ORACLE EMEA
LIMITED; J.D. EDWARD EUROPE
LIMITED; SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.,

No. 12-16944
D.C. No. 4:07-cv-01658-PJH
U.S. District Court for Northern
California, Oakland
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER

Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
SAP AG, a German corporation; SAP
AMERICA INC.; TOMORROWNOW
INC., a Texas corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.

The parties shall meet the following time schedule.
If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported
hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply.
Tue., September 11, 2012

Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for
Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the
Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of
receiving the email from PACER confirming your
registration.

Mon., October 1, 2012

Transcript shall be ordered.

Case: 12-16944

09/04/2012

Tue., October 30, 2012

ID: 8308854

DktEntry: 1-2

Page: 3 of 3

Transcript shall be filed by court reporter.

Mon., December 10, 2012 Appellants' opening brief and excerpts of record shall
be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir.
R. 32-1.
Tue., January 8, 2013

Appellees' answering brief and excerpts of record
shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and
9th Cir. R. 32-1.

The optional appellants' reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen
days of service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R.
32-1.
Failure of the appellants to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result
in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
FOR THE COURT:
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
William Fa'aita
Deputy Clerk