Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 235

Proposed Order re 233 MOTION to Compel Discovery Related to Hyperion, Retek, and EBS Products by Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited, Oracle USA Inc.. (Alinder, Zachary) (Filed on 1/16/2009)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 235

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) HOLLY A. HOWARD (SBN 136045) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94070 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, and Oracle EMEA Limited UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., v. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES, AND RULE 30(b)(6) TESTIMONY RELATED TO HYPERION, RETEK, AND EBS PRODUCTS

SAP AG, et al., Defendants.

A/72815586/2021039-0000324170

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The motion of Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, and Oracle EMEA Limited (collectively, "Oracle") to compel production of documents, answers to interrogatories, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition testimony by Defendants TomorrowNow, Inc., SAP AG, and SAP America, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants," and with Oracle, the "Parties") came to be heard on the 10th day of February, 2009, before this Court. All Parties received notice and an opportunity to be heard. After considering the pleadings and memoranda submitted by the Parties and all supporting papers, and having heard the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Oracle's motion to compel responses to interrogatories is GRANTED.

Defendants shall serve supplemental responses to Oracle's Third Set of Interrogatories to Defendant TomorrowNow, Inc. and Second Set of Interrogatories to Defendants SAP America and SAP AG (Interrogatory Nos. 2, 4, and 13) within 10 days of the date of this Order. 2. Oracle's motion to compel production of documents is GRANTED.

Defendants shall serve supplemental responses to Oracle's Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendants, Nos. 2, 5, 9, 12, 18-19, 24-26, 29-31, 34, and 42-43, within 5 court days of the date of this Order, and shall produce documents responsive to these document requests to Oracle's counsel's office within 30 days of the date of this Order. 3. Oracle's motion to compel Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) testimony is

GRANTED. Within 7 days of the date of this Order, Defendants shall each designate and within 35 days make available for deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6), one or more persons who consent to testify on their behalf regarding all topics listed in Oracle's Notices of Deposition Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) Regarding EBS, Retek, and Hyperion. DATED: _______________, 2009 Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge

A/72815586/2021039-0000324170

2

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL