Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 432

Proposed Order re 431 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Plaintiffs' Hypothetical License Damages Claim [Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Plaintiffs' Hypothetical License Damages Claim by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Lanier, Tharan) (Filed on 8/26/2009)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 432

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document432

Filed08/26/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' HYPOTHETICAL LICENSE DAMAGES CLAIM Date: October 28, 2009; Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 3, 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

SVI-71339v1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document432

Filed08/26/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Having considered Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Plaintiffs' Hypothetical License Damages Claim ("Motion for Partial Summary Judgment"), supporting declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier, and exhibits attached thereto, which were lodged with the Court on August 26, 2009: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants' motion is GRANTED. Summary judgment is proper when the pleadings, discovery and affidavits show that there is "no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). The undisputed facts in this case show that Plaintiffs and Defendants would not have agreed to a hypothetical license but for the alleged infringement. The Court therefore grants partial summary judgment that Plaintiffs are not entitled to pursue actual damages in the form of a hypothetical license. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________

By: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court Judge

SVI-71339v1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)