Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 502

Declaration of Bree Hann in Support of 501 MOTION Administrative Motion to Extend Period for Review of Oracle's Objections to Order of Discovery Magistrate Pursuant to Local Rule 72-2 filed byOracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. (Related document(s) 501 ) (Hann, Bree) (Filed on 10/1/2009)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 502

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document502

Filed10/01/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94070 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited, and Siebel Systems, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORACLE USA, INC., et al., v. Plaintiffs, OAKLAND DIVISION CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) DECLARATION OF BREE HANN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND PERIOD FOR REVIEW OF ORACLE'S OBJECTIONS TO ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 72-2

SAP AG, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
DECLARATION OF BREE HANN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

Dockets.Justia.com

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document502

Filed10/01/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, Bree Hann, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and a

counsel at Bingham McCutchen LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Ltd. and Siebel Systems, Inc. (collectively, "Oracle" or "Plaintiffs"). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated within this Declaration and could testify competently to them if required. 2. Plaintiffs have filed an Administrative Motion to Extend Period for

Review of Oracle's Objections To Order Pursuant to Local Rule 72-2 ("Administrative Motion"). Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11(a), Plaintiffs file this Declaration in Support of the Administrative Motion. 3. On October 1, 2009 Plaintiffs contacted Defendants and attempted to

obtain a stipulation from Defendants in support of this Administrative Motion. Defendants declined to stipulate, based on the timing and nature of Plaintiffs' request. Defendants informed Plaintiffs, however, that they do not intend to oppose Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion. Accordingly, Plaintiffs file this Declaration in lieu of stipulation from Defendants.

I declare under the laws of the United States and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed on October 1, 2009, in San Francisco, California.

DATED: October 1, 2009 By: /s/Bree Hann Bree Hann

2

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

DECLARATION OF BREE HANN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION