Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 506

STIPULATION re 505 MOTION to Seal Document Defendants' Administrative Motion to Permit Defendants to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Information Supporting Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion For Partial Summary Judg Stipulation to Permit Defendants to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Information Supporting Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 10/7/2009)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 506 Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document506 Filed10/07/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com jmcdonell@jonesday.com ewallace@jonesday.com Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 739-3939 Facsimile: (650) 739-3900 tglanier@jonesday.com jfroyd@jonesday.com Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: (832) 239-3939 Facsimile: (832) 239-3600 swcowan@jonesday.com jlfuchs@jonesday.com Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 donn.pickett@bingham.com geoff.howard@bingham.com holly.house@bingham.com zachary.alinder@bingham.com bree.hann@bingham.com DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 500 Oracle Parkway M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94070 Telephone: (650) 506-4846 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 dorian.daley@oracle.com jennifer.gloss@oracle.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited and Siebel Systems, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) STIPULATION TO PERMIT DEFENDANTS TO FILE UNDER SEAL PLAINTIFFS' INFORMATION SUPPORTING DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) Dockets.Justia.com Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document506 Filed10/07/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11(a) and 79-5(c), Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited and Siebel Systems, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc. and TomorrowNow, Inc. ("Defendants," and together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties") jointly submit this Stipulation to Permit Defendants to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Information Supporting Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Plaintiffs' Hypothetical License Damages Claim on October 7, 2009 ("Reply"); WHEREAS, at Plaintiffs' request, Defendants have filed an Administrative Motion to Permit Defendants to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Information Supporting Defendants' Reply; WHEREAS the requested relief is necessary and narrowly tailored to protect the alleged confidentiality of the materials put at issue by the Reply until such time as the Court makes a final ruling as to confidentiality of the relevant subject matter. Specifically, the following excerpts of the Reply contain information designated by Plaintiffs as "Highly Confidential Information Attorneys' Eyes Only": 7:25-26; 7:28; 8:3-4; 8:6-7; 8:9-11; and 8:12-17. Additionally, the following excerpts of the Reply contain information designated by Plaintiffs as "Confidential Information": 7:12-13; 7:16-17; 7:19-20; 7:22; and 15:14-15. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendants be permitted to move for permission to file under seal portions of the Reply, as described above. The Parties further agree that Defendants reserve their rights to challenge the confidentiality of the information filed under seal pursuant to this Stipulation. While the Parties agree that portions of the Reply may be publicly filed, the Parties also agree that the filing shall not be construed as a waiver of any confidentiality designation or other protection with respect to documents, transcripts or other information referred to in, or that serve as the basis for, the allegations or arguments made in it. IT IS SO STIPULATED. STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) -2- Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document506 Filed10/07/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: October 7, 2009 JONES DAY By: /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier Tharan Gregory Lanier Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. DATED: October 7, 2009 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Howard Geoffrey M. Howard Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORACLE USA, INC., ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ORACLE EMEA LIMITED, and SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC. -3- STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?