Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 793

Declaration of Chad Russell in Support of 790 Memorandum in Opposition, to Defendants' Motions in Limine filed byOracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit FF, # 33 Exhibit GG, # 34 Exhibit HH, # 35 Exhibit II, # 36 Exhibit JJ, # 37 Exhibit KK, # 38 Exhibit LL, # 39 Exhibit MM, # 40 Exhibit NN, # 41 Exhibit OO, # 42 Exhibit PP, # 43 Exhibit QQ, # 44 Exhibit RR, # 45 Exhibit SS, # 46 Exhibit TT)(Related document(s) 790 ) (Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/19/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 793 Att. 15 EXHIBIT O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 10 500 Oracle Parkway MIS 50p7 11 Redwood City, CA 94070 12 . Telephone: (650) 506-4846 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Attorneys .for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, and Oracle EMEA Limited UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO D M S I O N 20 21 22 23 ORACLE USA, INC., et. aI, Case No. 07-CV-1658 ( P i l i ) EDL P L A I N T I F F S ' S U P P L E M E N T A L AND AMENDED I N I T I A L D I S C L O S U R E S v. SAP AG, Plaintiffs, et al., Defendants. 24 25 26 27 Date: nla Time: n/a Judge: The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton Courtroom 11, 19th Floor CONTAINS INFORMATION DESIGNATED ffiGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 28 A/73042322.8 Case No. 07-eYˇ1658 (P1H) EDL PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES 1 2 different plaintiffs bring different causes o f action. Oracle would n o t seek o r be entitled to duplicate r e c o v e r y t h o u g h i t will likely s e e k damages i n t h e a l t e r n a t i v e . A. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I n connection with its Copyright Infringement cause o f action, Oracle has alternative measures o f its damages available to i t under the law. Oracle reserves its right to elect statutory damages for Defendants' infringement at the appropriate time, but currently does not envision t h a t it will do so. Rather, it currently seeks from Defendants the value o f the c o p y r i g h t e d m a t e r i a l D e f e n d a n t s i n f r i n g e d b o t h t h r o u g h h y p o t h e t i c a l l i c e n s e ( s ) and, i n t h e alternative, through a lost profits/infringers' profits analysis. Oracle expects to seek to recover damages based o n a hypothetical license for the P S F T / J D E - r e l a t e d i n f r i n g e m e n t b y Defendants. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e v a l u e o f t h e P S / J D E - r e l a t e d hypothetical license is determined by the value o f the rights being licensed o r received, as evidenced by the circumstances at the time (e.g., for Oracle - the fact that Oracle had j u s t paid significant amounts for the companies, the anticipated value to Oracle o f the PSFT/JDE acquisitions, O r a c l e ' s cross-sell and up-sell and service renewal history; for Defendants - the fact that the acquisitions significantly increased Oracle's threat to SAP, the anticipated value to SAP o f the TN acquisition, the amount that would not have to be expended by Defendants to l e g i t i m a t e l y c r e a t e w h a t t h e y w o u l d i n s t e a d license ( w h i c h w i l l also b e t h e s u b j e c t o f e x p e r t a n a l y s i s a n d r e l i e d u p o n by O r a c l e ' s d a m a g e s e x p e r t s ) , S A P ' s c r o s s - s e l l a n d u p - s e l l a n d s e r v i c e renewal history). Based o n the evidence to date, Oracle anticipates valuing the hypothetical licenses in the billions o f dollars. However, no formal computation has been completed. O r a c l e ' s alternative lost profits and infringers' profits analysis for its copyright infringement claims against Defendants is ongoing and incomplete. I t currently will encompass the lost profits associated with support customers who left Oracle, PeopleSoft or J.D. Edwards for SAP and TN, service,:,related discounts required to compete against SAP and TN, and lost l i c e n s e s a l e s a n d l i c e n s e d i s c o u n t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h c o m p e t i t i o n w i t h SAP a n d I N . E v i d e n c e relevant to this analysis is contained, for example, i n Defendants' multiple internal and external reports o f the revenues taken away from Oracle b y TN and b y the Safe Passage program, in the volwninous customer contracts and related files produced by the parties, i n the customer N73042322.8 47 Case No. 0 7 - e V - 1 6 5 8 (PJH) EDL P L A I N T I F F S ' S U P P L E M E N T A L AND A M E N D E D I N I T I A L D I S C L O S U R E S

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?