Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 793

Declaration of Chad Russell in Support of 790 Memorandum in Opposition, to Defendants' Motions in Limine filed byOracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit FF, # 33 Exhibit GG, # 34 Exhibit HH, # 35 Exhibit II, # 36 Exhibit JJ, # 37 Exhibit KK, # 38 Exhibit LL, # 39 Exhibit MM, # 40 Exhibit NN, # 41 Exhibit OO, # 42 Exhibit PP, # 43 Exhibit QQ, # 44 Exhibit RR, # 45 Exhibit SS, # 46 Exhibit TT)(Related document(s) 790 ) (Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/19/2010)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 793 Att. 40

EXHIBIT NN
Dockets.Justia.com

GERHARD OSWALD December 11, 2008 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Page 173
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION -----------------ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, ORACLE USA, INC., a Colorado corporation, and ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a California corporation, ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. )Case No. )07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) ) SAP AG, a German corporation, SAP ) AMERICA, INC., a Delaware ) corporation, TOMORROWNOW, INC., ) a Texas corporation, and DOES ) 1-50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) -----------------HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MR. GERHARD OSWALD VOLUME II Thursday, December 11, 2008 AT: 8:28 a.m. Taken at: Bingham McCutchen LLP 41 Lothbury London EC2R 7HF UNITED KINGDOM

Merrill Legal Solutions [phone]

GERHARD OSWALD December 11, 2008 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
Page 294
15:14:52 15:15:10 15:15:14 15:15:19 15:15:38 15:15:42 15:15:47 15:15:48 15:15:49 15:16:05 15:16:06 15:16:08 15:16:12 15:16:21 15:16:47 15:16:52 15:16:56 15:17:08 15:17:09 15:17:12 15:17:16 15:17:29 15:17:32 15:17:33 15:17:37 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
15:20:30 15:20:30 15:21:02 15:21:04 15:21:08 15:21:41 15:21:47 15:21:52 15:21:54 15:21:59 15:22:03

Page 296

Q. Now, SAP had planned to have TomorrowNow service several other Oracle-owned applications: Hyperion, Retek and E-Business Suite; correct? A. Yes. Q. And those decisions were prompted by Oracle's acquisition of those companies; right? A. Yes. Q. And the only thing that stopped SAP from going forward with those service expansions was the Oracle lawsuit; correct? A. That certainly was one contributing factor, yes.

15:22:08 15:22:12 15:22:15 15:22:19 15:22:56 15:23:04 15:23:09 15:23:12 15:23:16 15:23:21 15:23:24 15:23:27 15:23:51 15:23:53

.

Page 295
15:17:41 15:17:57 15:17:59 15:18:01 15:18:02 15:18:09 15:18:17 15:18:28 15:18:34 15:18:52 15:18:55 15:19:02 15:19:22 15:19:24 15:19:28 15:19:33 15:19:44 15:19:46 15:19:49 15:19:55 15:19:56 15:19:59 15:20:03 15:20:28 15:20:29
15:23:53

Page 297
15:23:56 15:24:00 15:24:19 15:24:22 15:24:28 15:24:30 15:24:31 15:24:32 15:24:40 15:24:44 15:24:44 15:24:48 15:24:52 15:24:56 15:25:01 15:25:26 15:25:27 15:25:33 15:25:38 15:25:44 15:26:12 15:26:14 15:26:18 15:26:19

.

32 (Pages 294 to 297) Merrill Legal Solutions [phone]