Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 952

Minute Entry: Status Conference held on 10/28/2010 before Phyllis J. Hamilton (Date Filed: 10/28/2010) re 939 MOTION Defendants' Administrative Motion For An Order Regarding Counsels' Extrajudicial Communications filed by SAP AG, Tomorrownow Inc, SAP America Inc, 950 MOTION to Continue filed by Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc. (Court Reporter Not Reported.) (nah, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 10/28/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 952 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES Date: October 28, 2010 (15 minutes) Case No: C-07-1658 PJH Case Name: Oracle USA, INC., et al. V. SAP AG, et al., Attorney(s) for Plaintiff: Attorney(s) for Defendant: Deputy Clerk: Nichole Heuerman PROCEEDINGS Status conference: 1. SAP will stipulate to liability for contributory copyright infringement leaving only damages issues for trial. Therefore, evidence and argument on contributory infringement will be excluded from trial unless admissible on the issue of damages of for context. In view of the stipulation, trial time will be decreased from 36 hours to 30 hours per side. Oracle's request to delay start date of trial is denied. Trial will commence on Monday November 1, 2010 with jury selection on Monday and opening statements on Tuesday. SAP's administrative motion for an order regarding counsels' extrajudicial communications is denied. The parties shall advise the court which of the deposition designation disputes is moot in light of SAP's stipulation to liability for contributory infringement by noon on October 29, 2010. Donn Pickett, Geoffrey Howard, Steven Holtzman, Fred Norton Tharan Lanier, Robert Middlestaedt Court Reporter: telephonic - not recorded JUDGE: Phyllis J. Hamilton 2. 3. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?