Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 970

Proposed Form of Verdict by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc Defendants' Revised Special Verdict Form. (Lee, Jacqueline) (Filed on 11/4/2010)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 970

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) DEFENDANTS' REVISED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

SVI-86563v1

DEFENDANTS' REVISED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to the Court's order at the November 1, 2010 proceedings and in light of additional stipulations reached by the Parties, Defendants submit the attached Revised Special Verdict Form. Dated: November 4, 2010 JONES DAY

By: /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier Tharan Gregory Lanier Counsel for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC.

SVI-86563v1

-1-

DEFENDANTS' REVISED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORACLE USA, INC., ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORP., and SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiffs, v. TOMORROWNOW, INC., SAP AMERICA, INC., AND SAP AG Defendants. We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find the following special verdict on the questions submitted to us: Actual Damages for Copyright Infringement 1. What is the dollar amount, if any, that Oracle International Corp. proved by a preponderance of the evidence that it is entitled to from Defendants as actual damages under its copyright infringement claim, in the form of EITHER a hypothetical license OR lost profits? HYPOTHETICAL LICENSE: $______________ OR LOST PROFITS: $______________. If you assigned actual damages in the form of a hypothetical license, please proceed to the end of the form (i.e. Do not answer question 2). If you assigned actual damages in the form of lost profits, please proceed to the following question. Infringer's Profits for Copyright Infringement 2. What is the dollar amount, if any, that Oracle International Corp. proved by a preponderance of the evidence that it is entitled to from Defendants as infringer's profits under its copyright infringement claim? $_______________. Proceed to following question. Have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Signed: ________________________________________ Dated: _______________________ Presiding Juror 1 Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) SPECIAL VERDICT FORM