Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Filing
980
Minute Entry: Jury Trial (day 5) held on 11/9/2010 before Phyllis J. Hamilton (Date Filed: 11/9/2010). Jury Trial (day 6) set for 11/12/2010 08:30 AM. (Court Reporter Raynee Mercado and Diane Skillman.) (nah, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 11/9/2010)
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Doc. 980
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES Date: November 9, 2010 (Time: 5 hour 13 minutes) Case No: C-07-1658 PJH Case Name: Oracle Corporation, et al. v. SAP AG, et al. Attorney(s) for Plaintiff: Attorney(s) for Defendant: Geoffrey Howard; Donn Pickett; Zachary Alinder; Steven Holtzman; Holly House; David Boies Tharan Gregory Lanier; Jacqueline Lee; Robert Mittelstaedt Court Reporter: Raynee Mercado and Diane Skillman JUDGE: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Deputy Clerk: Nichole Heuerman
PROCEEDINGS Jury Trial (day 5)-Held. See attached exhibit and witness list.
CASE CONTINUED TO: November 12, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. for Jury Trial (day 6).
Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No: C-07-1658 PJH Case Name: Oracle USA, et al. v. SAP AG, et al. EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST JUDGE Phyllis J. Hamilton PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY:
Geoffrey Howard; Donn Pickett; Zachary Alinder; Steven Holtzman; Holly House; David Boies
DEFENSE ATTORNEY:
Tharan Gregory Lanier; Jacqueline Lee; Robert Mittelstaedt
JURY SELECTION: 11/1/10 TRIAL DATE:
PLF NO. DEF NO
DATE/TIME
REPORTER(S):
Raynee Mercado and Diane Skillman EVI. REC DESCRIPTION
CLERK: Nichole Heuerman
OFFERED
ID
BY
Tuesday November 9, 2010 8:17 a.m. 8:17 a.m. the court is back in session plaintiffs' read stipulated evidence into the record; the deposition excerpts show to the jury in opening statements are admitted into evidence and shall be marked with exhibit numbers plaintiffs' exhibits 28, 4819, 25 and the parties joint exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are all admitted into evidence; plaintiffs' 6 discovery responses marked as plaintiffs' exhibits 1460, 1487, 1567, 1568, 1647, 1698 are admitted into evidence (exhibits to be redacted to remove defendants' objections) 8:25 a.m. 8:27 a.m. 8:30 a.m. 8:42 a.m. 8:42 a.m. defendants' exhibits A-367, A-371, A-372, A-373, A-374, A6038, A-6190 and A-229 are admitted into evidence counsel submit jointly prepared pretrial facts to be read to the jury the court hears argument regarding competing curative instruction to be read to the jury the jury is present continued direct examination of Mr. Meyer plaintiffs' exhibits 6, 12, 4814, 141, 23, 24, 161, 4811, 245, 958 and 37 already marked and admitted, used in conjunction with this witness 10:17 a.m. the jury takes a break
10:18 a.m. 10:22 a.m. 10:37 a.m. 10:37 a.m.
out of the presence of the jury the court informs the parties which limiting instruction will be used re: the court takes a 15 minute break the court is back in session continued direct examination of Mr. Meyer; the demonstrative exhibits used in conjunction with Mr. Meyer's testimony are admitted into evidence; counsel to mark with exhibit numbers the court reads an instruction to the jury cross examination of Mr. Meyer x x defendants' exhibit A-9332 the court takes a 15 minute break the court is back in session; continued cross examination of Mr. Meyer x x x x x x x defendants' exhibit A-2031 defendants' exhibit A-44 defendants' exhibit A-6036 defendants' exhibit A-303 defendants' exhibits A-421, A-277, A-4089, A-347, A-4090, A367 and A-371 already marked and admitted and used in conjunction with this witness
10:48 a.m. 10:49 a.m.
A9332
11/9/10 12:16 p.m. 12:32 p.m.
A2031 A-441 A6036 A-303
11/9/10 11/9/10 11/9/10 11/9/10
A-451
11/9/10 1:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. 1:37 p.m.
x
x
defendants' exhibit A-451 the jury is excused for the day the court discusses admissibility of emails with the parties the court hears further argument regarding curative instruction; the parties to submit further suggestions to the court by tomorrow 11/10/10 the court is adjourned for the day
2:00 p.m.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?