Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 982

Proposed Jury Instructions: Proposed Joint Instruction Regarding Redacted Materials, filed by Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc., SAP AG, SAP America Inc., Tomorrownow Inc. (Alinder, Zachary) (Filed on 11/10/2010) Modified on 11/12/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 982

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP JONES DAY DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) ROBERT A. MITTELSTAEDT (SBN 060359) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) JASON McDONELL (SBN 115084) HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) ELAINE WALLACE (SBN 197882) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) 555 California Street, 26th Floor BREE HANN (SBN 215695) San Francisco, CA 94104 Three Embarcadero Center Telephone: [phone] San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Facsimile: [phone] Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] JONES DAY [e-mail] THARAN GREGORY LANIER (SBN [e-mail] 138784) JANE L. FROYD (SBN 220776) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1755 Embarcadero Road DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Palo Alto, CA 94303 333 Main Street Telephone: [phone] Armonk, NY 10504 Facsimile: [phone] Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177) JONES DAY FRED NORTON (SBN 224725) SCOTT W. COWAN (Admitted Pro Hac 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Vice) Oakland, CA 94612 JOSHUA L. FUCHS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Telephone: [phone] Texas, Suite 3300 Facsimile: [phone] Houston, TX 77002 [e-mail] Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] Facsimile: [phone] DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) [e-mail] JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) [e-mail] 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94070 Attorneys for Defendants Telephone: [phone] SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and Facsimile: [phone] TomorrowNow, Inc. [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) v. Plaintiffs, JOINT PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION REGARDING REDACTED MATERIALS

SAP AG, et al., Defendants. 1

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

JOINT PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION REGARDING REDACTED MATERIALS
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: November 10, 2010 DATED: November 10, 2010

Redacted Materials From time to time, the Parties may offer into evidence documents that have been partially "redacted," which means that certain contents of the document have been blacked or whited out and stamped "redacted." Redactions are necessary for a wide variety of reasons, including that the redacted information is unrelated to the evidence in the case, that the Court has determined that the information is not admissible, or to protect as private the personal information of individuals or other companies not parties to this lawsuit. These are just examples. You may give the un-redacted information in any document whatever weight you choose, and you are not to consider any characterizations of the fact or existence of a redaction in any document, including by counsel.

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Howard Geoffrey M. Howard Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corp., and Siebel Systems, Inc.

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

JONES DAY By: /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier Tharan Gregory Lanier Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and TomorrowNow, Inc.

2

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

JOINT PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION REGARDING REDACTED MATERIALS