Brewster et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al

Filing 25

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/3/2007. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2007)

Brewster et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al

Doc. 25

Case 3:07-cv-01688-WHA

Document 25

Filed 04/03/2007

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JOSEPH BREWSTER and CECIL BREWSTER, Plaintiffs, v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / No. C 07-01688 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

The Court has received Ms. Chun's application to appear pro hac vice. Ms. Chun's application indicates that she is an active member in good standing of the bar of the Supreme Court of California. She apparently practices in Berkeley, California. By 4:00 P.M. on TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2007, Ms. Chun will please file a statement indicating why the Court should not find her ineligible to practice pro hac vice under Civil Local Rule 11-3(b), which states that an applicant is ineligible if she (1) resides in the State of California or (2) is regularly engaged in the practice of law in the State of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2007.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com