Bankston v. Curry

Filing 4

ORDER for summary and to show cause. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/4/2007. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2007)

Download PDF
Bankston v. Curry Doc. 4 Case 3:07-cv-01819-CRB Document 4 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LEWIS DALE BANKSTON, Petitioner, v. BEN CURRY, Acting Warden, Respondent. / No. C 07-01819 CRB ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Now pending before the Court is petitioner Lewis Dale Bankston's petition for habeas corpus challenging the denial of parole. The Court has reviewed the petition and finds that while it states a claim, it does not make clear precisely what legal claims petitioner makes. Accordingly, petitioner shall file a brief written summary of his claims. The summary should number each claim and describe the claim in one paragraph or less. Petitioner need not make arguments in support of the claims, he need only identify the claims. Such a summary will assist the Respondent in answering the claims and the Court in deciding this habeas petition. Petitioner shall file his written summary on or before April 27, 2007. Respondent shall file his answer within 30 days of the filing of petitioner's summary. Petitioner may file // // // Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-01819-CRB Document 4 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2007\1819\orderresummary.wpd 2 a traverse within 30 days of the filing of Respondent's answer. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 4, 2007 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?